-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump golangci-lint to 1.63.4 #6011
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for oasisprotocol-oasis-core canceled.
|
8738576
to
a89d279
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The title is not clear. You are not fixing the make lint
command, but the code to pass the lint check.
The comment is not clear. What is make-lint
command? By noise you mean errors?
If you have problems with linter, you should downgrade yours to the one set in the code or even better, fix code and bump the linter (like in #5854).
a89d279
to
b8a041f
Compare
b8a041f
to
3973c3a
Compare
3973c3a
to
a70a646
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Could also update the code to use the newly added functions max
, min
, .., but that is optional.
a70a646
to
87c6072
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6011 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 0 65.12% +65.12%
===========================================
Files 0 631 +631
Lines 0 64419 +64419
===========================================
+ Hits 0 41956 +41956
- Misses 0 17549 +17549
- Partials 0 4914 +4914 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Bump golangci-lint to
1.63.4
Warning
I only rename interface parameter names and some public methods' returned named values. This does not change the signature of functions so should not be breaking. Technically, if there would be tooling build around this, e.g. reflection, this would be breaking for the tooling. I don't think we have such clients, nor would this be breaking for the actual network etc...