Fluent syntax for defining typesafe Redux reducers on top of typescript-fsa.
This library will allow you to write typesafe reducers that look like this:
const reducer = reducerWithInitialState(INITIAL_STATE)
.case(setName, setNameHandler)
.case(addBalance, addBalanceHandler)
.case(setIsFrozen, setIsFrozenHandler);
It removes the boilerplate normally associated with writing reducers, including if-else chains, the default case, and the need to pull the payload field off of the action.
This library allows you to define reducers by chaining a series of handlers for different action types and optionally providing an initial value. It builds on top of and assumes familiarity with the excellent typescript-fsa.
Suppose we have used typescript-fsa to define our state and some actions:
import actionCreatorFactory from "typescript-fsa";
const actionCreator = actionCreatorFactory();
interface State {
name: string;
balance: number;
isFrozen: boolean;
}
const INITIAL_STATE: State = {
name: "Untitled",
balance: 0,
isFrozen: false,
};
const setName = actionCreator<string>("SET_NAME");
const addBalance = actionCreator<number>("ADD_BALANCE");
const setIsFrozen = actionCreator<boolean>("SET_IS_FROZEN");
Using vanilla typescript-fsa
, we might define a reducer as follows:
import { Action } from "redux";
import { isType } from "typescript-fsa";
function reducer(state = INITIAL_STATE, action: Action): State {
if (isType(action, setName)) {
return { ...state, name: action.payload };
} else if (isType(action, addBalance)) {
return {
...state,
balance: state.balance + action.payload,
};
} else if (isType(action, setIsFrozen)) {
return { ...state, isFrozen: action.payload };
} else {
return state;
}
}
Using this library, the above is exactly equivalent to the following code:
import { reducerWithInitialState } from "typescript-fsa-reducers";
const reducer = reducerWithInitialState(INITIAL_STATE)
.case(setName, (state, name) => ({ ...state, name }))
.case(addBalance, (state, amount) => ({
...state,
balance: state.balance + amount,
}))
.case(setIsFrozen, (state, isFrozen) => ({ ...state, isFrozen }));
Note that unlike the vanilla case, there is no need to pull the payload off of
the action, as it is passed directly to the handler, nor is it necessary to
specify a default case which returns state
unmodified.
Everything is typesafe. If the types of the action payload and handler don't line up, then TypeScript will complain. If you find it easier to read, you can of course pull out the handlers into separate functions, as shown in the Introduction.
If the full action is needed rather than just the payload, .caseWithAction()
may be used in place of .case()
. This may be useful if you intend to pass the
action unchanged to a different reducer, or if you need to read the meta
field
of the action. For example:
import { Action } from "typescript-fsa";
const setText = actionCreator<string>("SET_TEXT");
const reducer = reducerWithInitialState({ text: "", lastEditBy: "" })
.caseWithAction(incrementCount, (state, { payload, meta }) => ({
text: payload,
lastEditBy: meta.author,
}));
// Returns { text: "hello", lastEditBy: "cbrontë" }.
reducer(undefined, setText("hello", { author: "cbrontë" }));
Further, a single handler may be assigned to multiple action types at once using
.cases()
or .casesWithAction()
:
const reducer = reducerWithInitialState(initialState)
.cases([setName, addBalance], (state, payload) => {
// Payload has type SetNamePayload | AddBalancePayload.
// ...
});
The reducer builder chains are mutable. Each call to .case()
modifies the
callee to respond to the specified action type. If this is undesirable, see the
.build()
method below.
For this library to be useful, you will need typescript-fsa as well to define your actions.
With Yarn:
yarn add typescript-fsa-reducers typescript-fsa
Or with NPM:
npm install --save typescript-fsa-reducers typescript-fsa
Starts a reducer builder-chain which uses the provided initial state if passed
undefined
as its state. For example usage, see the Usage section
above.
Starts a reducer builder-chain without special logic for an initial state.
undefined
will be treated like any other value for the state.
Redux seems to really want you to provide an initial state for your reducers.
Its createStore
API encourages it and combineReducers
function enforces it.
For the Redux author's reasoning behind this, see this
thread. For this reason,
reducerWithInitialState
will likely be the more common choice, but the option
to not provide an initial state is there in case you have some means of
composing reducers for which initial state is unnecessary.
Note that since the type of the state cannot be inferred from the initial state, it must be provided as a type parameter:
const reducer = reducerWithoutInitialState<State>()
.case(setName, setNameHandler)
.case(addBalance, addBalanceHandler)
.case(setIsFrozen, setIsFrozenHandler);
Starts a builder-chain which produces a "reducer" whose return type is a supertype of the input state. This is most useful for handling a state which may be in one of several "modes", each of which responds differently to actions and can transition to the other modes. Many programs will not have a use for this.
Note that the function produced is technically not a reducer because the initial and updated states are different type.
Example usage:
type State = StoppedState | RunningState;
interface StoppedState {
type: "STOPPED";
}
interface StartedState {
type: "STARTED";
count: number;
}
const startWithCount = actionCreator<number>("START_WITH_COUNT");
const addToCount = actionCreator<number>("ADD_TO_COUNT");
const stop = actionCreator<void>("STOP");
function startWithCountHandler(state: StoppedState, count: number): State {
return { type: "STARTED", count };
}
function addToCountHandler(state: StartedState, count: number): State {
return { ...state, count: state.count + count };
}
function stopHandler(state: StartedState): State {
return { type: "STOPPED" };
}
const stoppedReducer = upcastingReducer<StoppedState, State>()
.case(startWithCount, startWithCountHandler);
const startedReducer = upcastingReducer<StartedState, State>()
.case(addToCount, addToCountHandler)
.case(stop, stopHandler);
function reducer(state: State, action: Redux.Action): State {
if (state.type === "STOPPED") {
return stoppedReducer(state, action);
} else if (state.type === "STARTED") {
return startedReducer(state, action);
} else {
throw new Error("Unknown state");
}
}
Mutates the reducer such that it applies handler
when passed actions matching
the type of actionCreator
. For examples, see Usage.
Like .case()
, except that handler
receives the entire action as its second
argument rather than just the payload. This is useful if you want to read other
properties of the action, such as meta
or error
, or if you want to pass the
entire action unmodified to some other function. For an example, see
Usage.
Like .case()
, except that multiple action creators may be provided and the
same handler is applied to all of them. That is,
reducerWithInitialState(initialState)
.cases([setName, addBalance, setIsFrozen], handler);
is equivalent to
reducerWithInitialState(initialState)
.case(setName, handler)
.case(addBalance, handler)
.case(setIsFrozen, handler);
Note that the payload passed to the handler may be of the type of any of the
listed action types' payloads. In TypeScript terms, this means it has type P1 | P2 | ...
, where P1, P2, ...
are the payload types of the listed action
creators.
The payload type is inferred automatically for up to four action types. After that, it must be supplied as a type annotation, for example:
reducerWithInitialState(initialState)
.cases<{ documentId: number }>([
selectDocument,
editDocument,
deleteDocument,
sendDocument,
archiveDocument
], handler)
Like .cases()
, except that the handler receives the entire action as its
second argument rather than just the payload.
Returns a plain reducer function whose behavior matches the current state of the
reducer chain. Further updates to the chain (through calls to .case()
) will
have no effect on this function.
There are two reasons you may want to do this:
-
You want to ensure that the reducer is not modified further
Calling
.build()
is an example of defensive coding. It prevents someone from causing confusing behavior by importing your reducer in an unrelated file and adding cases to it. -
You want your package to export a reducer, but not have its types depend on
typescript-fsa-reducers
If the code that defines a reducer and the code that uses it reside in separate NPM packages, you may run into type errors since the exported reducer has type
ReducerBuilder
, which the consuming package does not recognize unless it also depends ontypescript-fsa-reducers
. This is avoided by returning a plain function instead.
Example usage:
const reducer = reducerWithInitialState(INITIAL_STATE)
.case(setName, setNameHandler)
.case(addBalance, addBalanceHandler)
.case(setIsFrozen, setIsFrozenHandler)
.build();
Copyright © 2017 David Philipson