Test the model with anatomical variations #75
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…variations Expanded the dictionary to cover additional spine vertebrae labels from C8 through L9, enhancing the segmentation capabilities for a broader range of spinal regions. Updated `region_max_sizes` to accommodate these changes, allowing for more inclusive processing of vertebraes in the iterative labeling. Removed the constraint that limited processing to only the first two landmarks, addressing a prior limitation and improving overall accuracy in landmark-based segmentation. This work addresses part of the spine segmentation enhancements.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
!!!NOT TO BE MERGED NOW!!!
This PR is for testing the model against anatomical variations.
In this PR we used the C7T1 and T12L1 landmarks to determine abnormal number of vertebrae instead of using the normal number of vertebrae in each region as maximum.
We can test this using the dataset referenced in the following paper: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-01060-0
#74
Note: The current main branch is also support 4 and 6 lumbar vertebrae when full field of view is provided: