bounding boxes' tracks --> bounding boxes tracks

[sfmig]

Description

A small win towards next term 😉

What is this PR

• Bug fix
• Addition of a new feature
• Other

Why is this PR needed?
There was inconsistency in our docs when referring to bounding boxes trajectories.

What does this PR do?

• replaces all references to "bounding boxes' tracks" ---> "bounding boxes tracks"
• removes the apostrophe from similar expressions (bounding boxes centroids, trajectories, dataset, arrays

References

#357

How has this PR been tested?

Tests pass locally and in CI

Is this a breaking change?

No.

Does this PR require an update to the documentation?

It includes an update to the docstrings.

Checklist:

• The code has been tested locally
• [ n/a ] Tests have been added to cover all new functionality
• The documentation has been updated to reflect any changes
• The code has been formatted with pre-commit

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.80%. Comparing base (41942e1) to head (4f39b69).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #392   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.80%   99.80%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines        1048     1048           
=======================================
  Hits         1046     1046           
  Misses          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[lochhh]

Thanks @sfmig for the small victory 😜
Just a general thought/question: given we have 'pose tracks', does it make more sense to have 'bounding box tracks' rather than 'bounding boxes tracks'? If we opt for the singular term, we could also use 'bounding box centroids' 🪱

[niksirbi]

Just a general thought/question: given we have 'pose tracks', does it make more sense to have 'bounding box tracks' rather than 'bounding boxes tracks'? If we opt for the singular term, we could also use 'bounding box centroids

My two cents on this:

personally I much prefer the singular "box" in "bounding box tracks" or "bounding box centroids". Afaik it's grammatically ok, since the plural is expressed in the "tracks" or "centroids". That said, I'm aware we had a vote on this (slack poll), and I think the version with the plural + apostrophe won out (as in "poses' tracks"). For reasons already stated I dislike the apostrophe so we are back to square one?

To bring this not-so-important issue to a close, I'm fine with either "bounding box tracks" or "bounding boxes tracks", but whatever we end up using should also apply to centroids.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud