Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new template for Fsas Si-R
show ether
#1971Add new template for Fsas Si-R
show ether
#1971Changes from 2 commits
577e204
7657eb8
ded49cd
dc63678
f76cf79
1182c9b
66c1487
c72d35b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Support one and two word statuses (ex:
offline (backup)
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The "commit suggestion" button can help easily merge in suggestions. Thank you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
STATUS
have to support the following status:offline
offline (backup)
offline (startup down)
offline (recovery manual)
I added a test case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a bit of a bummer the status data is captured twice.
I do notice that's likely because of the
offline (backup)
anddisable
statuses.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the review. Would you prefer not to capture
STATUS
when notoffline
ordisalble
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jmcgill298 @jvanderaa @itdependsnetworks
What are your thoughts on the
STATUS
sometimes capturing data that is captured in other capture groups?The downside here is that the
STATUS
capture group would have to become much more rigid (to be the two statuses in the present test data) so it doesn't match the speed/duplex/MDI.Update: Change sentence grammar.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think if the goal is to split the status field into multiple capture groups, then the status field should capture
auto
,disable
, andoffline
text, and then it would be an empty string if it is set to a particular speed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this idea.
I cooked up some suggestions.