Update cisco_asa_show_running-config_object_network.textfsm

[ppisnjak]

Added better FQDN object support. Cisco ASA config shows following options:
network-object mode commands/options:
WORD < 128 char Fully Qualified Domain Name - FQDN must begin and end with a digit/letter. Only letters, digits, and hyphen are allowed as internal characters. Labels are separated by a dot.
v4 IPv4 FQDN object
v6 IPv6 FQDN object

Objects can be specified as v4 or v6 or can be created without specification. This enables correct parsing since before they would be parsed as "v4" or "v6".

[mjbear]

Added better FQDN object support. Cisco ASA config shows following options: network-object mode commands/options: WORD < 128 char Fully Qualified Domain Name - FQDN must begin and end with a digit/letter. Only letters, digits, and hyphen are allowed as internal characters. Labels are separated by a dot. v4 IPv4 FQDN object v6 IPv6 FQDN object

Objects can be specified as v4 or v6 or can be created without specification. This enables correct parsing since before they would be parsed as "v4" or "v6".

Howdy @ppisnjak
Thank you for your contribution!

1. I worked up a minor PR Regenerate existing parsed data for ASA show run obj network ppisnjak/ntc-templates#1 against your patch-1 branch to regenerate existing parsed data.

   • You're able to review my PR against your branch/PR and easily accept my changes into your branch if they pass your review. 😅

2. Would you please add a short file of some sanitized test data?

   • Based on the diffs of the current data, there isn't test data for the bug you found.
   • Once you have test data, you can create a new file in addition to the existing one in the designated path and use helper scripts to generate the parsed YAML data.
   • Commit both the raw CLI output and the parsed YAML to (your branch for) this PR to provide test coverage.

Thank you!

[ppisnjak]

@mjbear Thanks for assistance! Since this is my first pull request ever, what is the following procedure? We just wait for code owners approve or is there something else needed? Thanks!

[mjbear]

@mjbear Thanks for assistance! Since this is my first pull request ever, what is the following procedure? We just wait for code owners approve or is there something else needed? Thanks!

That is correct.
After it has been a week or so I tend to gently nudge the maintainers.
As of late we're stacking up some PRs and they've been cranking through some of them today. 😁

Note: I was being a bit silly with IPv10, but I'm good with the regex as it doesn't hurt! 🫠