fix for #631 where slight differences seen in Kptfile upstream format…

[mansoor17syed]

This push fixes issue #631

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: mansoor17syed / name: mansoor (3ee4fae, eaa1551)

[nephio-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mansoor17syed
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign efiacor for approval by writing /assign @efiacor in a comment. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[liamfallon]

Hi @mansoor17syed thanks for taking on this issue. The kpt alpha repo and kpt alpha rpkg commands have been deprecated by the porchctl command. I think this issue is likely to be still there in porchctl. I wonder if you could verify that. It's probably the porchctl rpkg get and porchctl rpkg clone commands that should be checked.