CMR-10173: Update UMM-C for Web Unitification round 2

[jmaeng72]

THIS IS A DRAFT PR -- NOT READY FOR OFFICIAL REVIEW

Overview

What is the feature/fix?

Updating umm-c schema and translations

Adding 2 new enums values for AssociatedDOIs/Type:
IsPreviousVersionOf
IsNewVersionOf

Adding 3 new enums values for CollectionProgress:
PREPRINT, INREVIEW, and SUPERSEDED

Delete enum value for CollectionProgress:
NOT APPLICABLE

What is the Solution?

See above

What areas of the application does this impact?

Checklist

• I have updated/added unit and int tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit and int tests pass locally and remotely
• clj-kondo has been run locally and all errors corrected
• I have removed unnecessary/dead code and imports in files I have changed
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have cleaned up integration tests by doing one or more of the following:
  • migrated any are2 tests to are3 in files I have changed
  • de-duped, consolidated, removed dead int tests
  • transformed applicable int tests into unit tests
  • refactored to reduce number of system state resets by updating fixtures (use-fixtures :each (ingest/reset-fixture {})) to be :once instead of :each

[eereiter]

We no longer support dif9, but we still have some collections in UAT and SIT that we have to delete. I am pretty sure we removed all DIF 9 records from production. Reading from DIF 9 to UMM should be good as is. We will have to make sure UMM-C to DIF 9 doesn't break, it if does then we need to fix the translations to what ever the dif 9 valid values are, we are not changing the dif 9 schema

[eereiter]

You will need to add the mappings here.

[eereiter]

From UMM to ISO you used Capital letters, you should use the same case going back and forth. Also put in spaces for the IsPreviousVersionOf for the second value to read "Is Previous Version Of" same for IsNewVersionOf

[jmaeng72]

This is different from the slack conversation we had where we wanted to change this:

Add to the map on line 120 "ispreviousversionof" IsPreviousVersionOf" and "isnewversionof" "IsNewVersionOf". Without doing the coding myself I can't tell what the XML will look like.

Is this something we need to discuss further?

[eereiter]

I can also give you sample files that you can test with on your local CMR.