Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[review] MIP-49: NB-FFS Governed Rewards and Fees #49

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

l-monninger
Copy link
Contributor

@l-monninger l-monninger commented Nov 6, 2024

Summary

MD-49
MIP-49

@l-monninger l-monninger requested a review from apenzk as a code owner November 6, 2024 09:05
@l-monninger l-monninger changed the title Just Reward [draft] MIP-49: Just Reward Nov 6, 2024
@l-monninger l-monninger changed the title [draft] MIP-49: Just Reward [draft] MIP-49: AB-FFS Governed Rewards and Fees Nov 6, 2024
In general, settlement costs can be modeled in the following form:

```math
\text{Settlement Cost} = \text{Number of Validators} * \text{L1 Gas Fee}
Copy link
Contributor

@apenzk apenzk Nov 6, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
\text{Settlement Cost} = \text{Number of Validators} * \text{L1 Gas Fee}
\text{Settlement Cost} = \text{Number of Validators} * \text{L1 Gas Fee} + \text{L1 Gas Fee for Rollovers}

@apenzk apenzk changed the title [draft] MIP-49: AB-FFS Governed Rewards and Fees [review] MIP-49: AB-FFS Governed Rewards and Fees Nov 12, 2024
@apenzk apenzk changed the title [review] MIP-49: AB-FFS Governed Rewards and Fees [review] MIP-49: NB-FFS Governed Rewards and Fees Nov 22, 2024
@apenzk apenzk added bridge and removed bridge labels Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants