Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOCS-1190: RELEASE.2024-04-18T19-09-19Z #1215

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 10, 2024
Merged

DOCS-1190: RELEASE.2024-04-18T19-09-19Z #1215

merged 2 commits into from
May 10, 2024

Conversation

ravindk89
Copy link
Collaborator

Partially addresses #1190

No staged build unless someone requests it.

Summary

After some thinking, we've leaned towards just making a note of the upgrade step and calling it done. We do not typically make extended discussion of backward-breaking changes at this time, and have no where to keep that sort of guidance.

Maybe in the future or as part of a larger re-arch we can consider where we would best keep that kind of guidance.

As far as the rest:

  • We are not covering s3zip today, so that's a no-op. We should leave the ticket open in the event we have bandwidth to document the feature later
  • No changes to Console that need documentation at this time
  • Added a quick callout on the warning behavior to the Versioning page
  • Metrics v3 is also still In progress, come back to this once the project is fully baked.

@ravindk89 ravindk89 requested review from djwfyi and feorlen May 10, 2024 20:26
@ravindk89 ravindk89 self-assigned this May 10, 2024
@ravindk89 ravindk89 added the Review Assigned Reviewers Must LGTM To Close label May 10, 2024
@ravindk89
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@feorlen back to you!

Copy link
Collaborator

@feorlen feorlen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏻

@ravindk89 ravindk89 merged commit 775e99d into main May 10, 2024
@ravindk89 ravindk89 deleted the DOCS-1190 branch May 10, 2024 22:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Review Assigned Reviewers Must LGTM To Close
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants