-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 252
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(ffi): generate formatted captions for send_*
media fns
#4261
Conversation
Changelog: For `Timeline::send_*` fns, treat the passed `caption` parameter as markdown and use the HTML generated from it as the `formatted_caption` if there is none.
b695229
to
6e75bdd
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4261 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.92% 84.91% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 274 274
Lines 29805 29805
==========================================
- Hits 25311 25309 -2
- Misses 4494 4496 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
/// - Return `None` if there are no `caption` or `formatted_caption` parameters. | ||
fn formatted_caption_from( | ||
caption: &Option<String>, | ||
formatted_caption: &Option<FormattedBody>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: don't pass formatted_caption
by ref, since it must be consumed by this function; avoids a clone()
below
/// return the result. | ||
/// - Return `None` if there are no `caption` or `formatted_caption` parameters. | ||
fn formatted_caption_from( | ||
caption: &Option<String>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: use Option<&str>
and have the caller use .deref()
here
(Some(body), None) => RumaFormattedBody::markdown(body), | ||
(_, Some(formatted_body)) => Some(formatted_body.clone().into()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would invert those two branches, otherwise a body and a formatted_body will result in the body overriding the formatted body 🤪
…This needs a test 😁
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would invert those two branches, otherwise a body and a formatted_body will result in the body overriding the formatted body 🤪
I don't mind, but can't the branch that overrides only happen if there is no formatted body (body -> Some, formatted_body -> None)
? Maybe I misunderstood how this pattern matching of tuples work.
…This needs a test 😁
I guess I can move this into the SDK crate then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah you're right, sorry I misread that. That would then be clearer as a series of if let some return, maybe?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't matter much but I find the match much clearer, every single branch is neatly presented to you and the compiler ensures that all the branches are handled.
A series of if let Some return
let's you skip branches and then I need to spend more time investigating which branches are skipped if any.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't matter much but I find the match much clearer
I just changed it 😭 .
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah sorry, though I don't really think you need to change it back. I'm just saying that using a match like that is completely fine and even preferred by me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also found it more expressive. Since it states all 3 possible causes and the states of the variables for those. Anyway, it's not a big deal as you said.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was definitely confused and misread it, I do find the new code much much clearer since it's in-your-face at the beginning that the formatted body is preferred over anything else, so YMMV, heh :)
It seems like, if I enable the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the tests!
(Some(body), None) => RumaFormattedBody::markdown(body), | ||
(_, Some(formatted_body)) => Some(formatted_body.clone().into()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was definitely confused and misread it, I do find the new code much much clearer since it's in-your-face at the beginning that the formatted body is preferred over anything else, so YMMV, heh :)
crates/matrix-sdk/src/utils.rs
Outdated
/// - If a `formatted_body` exists, return it. | ||
/// - If it doesn't exist but there is a `body`, parse it as markdown and return | ||
/// the result. | ||
/// - Return `None` if there are no `body` or `formatted_body` parameters. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Think this comment could be more concise: "return the formatted body if available, or interpret the body as markdown, if provided."
crates/matrix-sdk/src/utils.rs
Outdated
} else if let Some(body) = body { | ||
FormattedBody::markdown(body) | ||
} else { | ||
None | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
} else if let Some(body) = body { | |
FormattedBody::markdown(body) | |
} else { | |
None | |
} | |
} else { | |
body.map(FormattedBody::markdown) | |
} |
f6c6fc1
to
f76d83d
Compare
Add the `markdown` feature to the SDK crate, otherwise we can't use `FormattedBody::markdown`. Refactor the pattern matching into an if, add tests to check its behaviour.
f76d83d
to
5d77f32
Compare
At the moment we could only pass existing
caption
andformatted_caption
parameters, assuming they were either plain text forcaption
or already parsed forformatted_caption
. With these changes, thecaption
parameter is now treated as MD and transformed to HTML which will be used asformatted_caption
if none is provided.Bonus screenshot:
Signed-off-by: