Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default values on attribute_groups and attributes #1330

Conversation

netzknecht
Copy link
Contributor

Add default values on attribute_groups and attributes table.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 10, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
lunar-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 1, 2023 9:36am

@netzknecht netzknecht force-pushed the fix-missing-defaults-on-attributes-and-attribute-groups branch from ce82562 to b487cd3 Compare November 13, 2023 10:27
@netzknecht netzknecht force-pushed the fix-missing-defaults-on-attributes-and-attribute-groups branch from 8440b1f to f90085f Compare November 30, 2023 16:54
@netzknecht
Copy link
Contributor Author

@glennjacobs and @alecritson please check out and review the changes of my last commits regarding your previous concerns. Thank you!

@netzknecht netzknecht changed the base branch from 0.7 to 0.8 December 18, 2023 21:43
@glennjacobs glennjacobs added the enhancement Improvement to existing functionality label Dec 22, 2023
@glennjacobs glennjacobs added this to the v0.8 milestone Dec 22, 2023
@glennjacobs glennjacobs self-assigned this May 6, 2024
@glennjacobs
Copy link
Contributor

This PR seems to have lots of updates not associated to the functionality specified. Closing, but feel free to reopen if you can make a PR that is focused on a single issue.

@glennjacobs glennjacobs closed this May 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement to existing functionality
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants