Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DM-42530: changes for automatic Large Glideins #25
DM-42530: changes for automatic Large Glideins #25
Changes from 4 commits
86150f2
a59166b
d378c10
16d247e
b13642f
1f28c33
52d980c
8c5832e
60d2bf6
3c2378c
c45b2db
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To my understanding these "preparations" (lines 221 - 224) are made only to call
condor_q()
later in line 260. However, it looks like the code is concerned with identifying the local Schedd only. As a result, it is a bit redundant ascondor_q()
can do it for you if you omit the (optional)schedds
argument.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Took me a while to find "isnt" in the documentation. In case someone else needs the link: https://htcondor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/classads/classad-mechanism.html#expression-operators
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In some future cleanup ticket, may want to look into python logging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Empty Python containers are false, so the preferred way to check if
condor_data
contains any elements would beThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this check is necessary (or alternatively the previous one in line 266). If
condor_data
contains no elements we will never reach this point because of thereturn
statement in line 268 and containers size can't be a negative number.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure why we need to set
existingGlideinsIdle
,numberOfGlideinsReduced
, andnumberOfGlideins
to zero here. Each of these variables seems to be initialized with a different value later (see lines 320, 334, and 339, respectively).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This exception for problems querying condor schedd has a ton of code in it post that query code. I would move this except closer to the condor_q query and if wanting to catch other exceptions add more try/except blocks with more related messages.