-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
libs: add sambanova-lagchain integration package #29417
libs: add sambanova-lagchain integration package #29417
Conversation
jhpiedrahitao
commented
Jan 24, 2025
- Description:: Add sambanova-langchain integration package as suggested in previous PRs
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Hi @efriis following your suggestion in previous PRs we are adding the sambanova-langchain integration package #29070 (comment) cc @ccurme |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks! Any chance you could add the @deprecated
decorators to the community versions, with e.g. alternative_import="langchain_sambanova.ChatSambaNovaCloud
?
since should be 0.3.16 (next community version)
removal should be 1.0
@efriis done! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
@@ -546,7 +545,7 @@ | |||
"source": [ | |||
"## API reference\n", | |||
"\n", | |||
"For detailed documentation of all ChatSambaNovaCloud features and configurations head to the API reference: https://python.langchain.com/api_reference/community/chat_models/langchain_community.chat_models.sambanova.ChatSambaNovaCloud.html" | |||
"For detailed documentation of all ChatSambaNovaCloud features and configurations head to the API reference: https://python.langchain.com/api_reference/sambanova/chat_models/langchain_sambanova.ChatSambaNovaCloud.html" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
link 404s (we don't build API references for external packages)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ccurme should we only remove the cell? is there any way to get API reference included as all the other provider integrations?