-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FileFormats] read double-sided variable bounds separately #2548
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry if this is too nit-picky, but: Could creating the "helper"
Interval
set be an overhead for large files?Something like this would be possible here (but makes it more convoluted):
This would also handle two edge cases differently:
data.col_lower[i] > data.col_upper[i]
, it adds the bounds keeping the model infeasible (bounds_to_set
would currently remove the bounds and create a free variable)data.col_lower[i] == data.col_upper[i]
, it sticks to adding bounds, and does not convert those into a single equality(1.) is maybe not really important, but (2.) could lead to similar problems as the initial version:
has_*_bound
will returnfalse
, and I can't change the bounds anymore.Further, this also impacts how
fix(x, value; force=false)
behaves. With bounds it errors, with theEqualTo
it overwrites.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nope. It's a
struct
that is on the stack.bounds_to_set
already does this 😄 it will return anInterval
only if both sides are finite.You'd need to
unfix(x); set_lower_bound(x, lb)
.The issue is that JuMP doesn't offer a nice way to interact with interval bounds.
I agree that lower/upper/fixed bounds are more convoluted than a plain lower/upper bound. You'll need to write some JuMP code to deal with the different situations.