Open Community Working Meeting 2023-10-02 - 14:00 PT

[benjagm]

Open Community Working Meeting 2023-10-02 - 14:00 PT

📺 See Recording

⏪ Go To Previous Meeting

Agenda:

Topic	Owner	Decision/NextStep
Review last call's action items	[facilitator]
Steps to complete the new website rollout and disable pipelines of previous repos. More information here	@Relequestual
Website release causes HTTP requests to 301 redirect to HTTPS. One user has reported this causes a problem for one implementation (net.jimblackler.jsonschemafriend) which does not follow the redirect. - Question: Do we want to fix this? Should old meta-schemas be available on http only URLs? (We should be able to without huge effort if we want.) (OP filed an Issue with the implementation.)	@Relequestual

Action items:
No action items has been captured.

Notes:

• We started discussing various topics including updating the Jason schema playground and sharing schemas.

• The team discussed some steps to complete the roll-out of the new website including disabling GitHub pages and archiving repositories for the old website, the blog and Understanding JSON Schema.

• They also addressed the problem of an implementation (net.jimblackler.jsonschemafriend) breaking due to HTTP to HTTPS redirect, and agreed that it exposed bugs that needed fixing. They debated whether to revert the implementation or fix the library, ultimately deciding to bundle the master schemas or stop doing schema validation.

• The discussion revolved around a specific implementation that required calling a method called loadSchema to validate using a schema, which would automatically download the schema if it was not already in the schema store. They concluded that although it was a temporary solution, it was not ideal and should be modified to avoid the need for such a method.

Attendees

Account
@gregsdennis
@Relequestual
@jviotti
@jdesrosiers
Eli Sherer

[jviotti]

Should old meta-schemas be available on http only URLs?

This sounds right to me. Old metaschemas were hosted on HTTP only, and even a 301 in those cases is somewhat a breaking change.

[benjagm]

Closing this issue as all tasks are completed. Thanks for your contributions!