This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 13, 2019. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
Re-Introduce into_open_drain_output #51
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0fcf8c3
Re-Introduce into_open_drain_output
kellerkindt 3892909
Use specialization feature to read from IDR instead from ODR in OpenD…
kellerkindt 3e2476a
Add description why a different implementation for OpenDrain mode is …
kellerkindt bf84d53
Remove leading empty lines in gpio.rs
kellerkindt 7e0c324
Increase max speed top 50MHz
kellerkindt 04225b5
Merge branch 'master' into patch-3
kellerkindt 42b0961
Fix compile error, somehow this got eaten away by the merge?
kellerkindt da288c3
Implement InputPin for $PXx<Output<OpenDrain>> and $PXi<Output<OpenDr…
kellerkindt 86842b3
Revert "Implement InputPin for $PXx<Output<OpenDrain>> and $PXi<Outpu…
kellerkindt 35c2261
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/japaric/stm32f103xx-hal i…
kellerkindt 7810509
Remove specialization no longer required since it is no longer required
kellerkindt 0cf6f85
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/japaric/stm32f103xx-hal i…
kellerkindt File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So what happens if output (ODR) is set to low? Will this function do the right thing? Perhaps, this should check ODR first; if that's set to zero this returns true otherwise it returns the value stored in IDR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Writing low causes it to be pulled down to low. So if one writes high, the state depends on whether there is a pull-up resistor connected and on how other devices react, but if set to low, the output is pulled down to low by the chip.
It does. I am currently communicating with ten OneWire devices through this OpenDrain implementation.
That should always return the same as reading directly from IDR, since the chip is trying its best to pull the pin down. I can only imagine it to return a wrong value, if one broke the output driver. I think adding a check for ODR would only cause unnecessary runtime costs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the HAL should work on every microcontroller architecture the same way.
I'm not sure that is_high(), is_low() is always available to read back output pins set state (so those could be removed from the Output trait).
I'm also not sure that an open drain out pin is always able to act the same time as input pin an read the voltage level.
On architectures, which support these, into_open_drain_output could return (OutputPin, InputPin) tuple based on the same pin, but maybe on other architectures you need to use 2 pins physically connected for the same purpose...
Unfortunately I can not tell examples for such a dumb architecture right now...
(If no one else does, then I'm perfectly fine with @kellerkindt's implementation.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This crate is solely about the stm32f103xx family?
The current OutputPin trait already requires that tho. If I am not mistaken, all chips of the stm32f103xx family support the open-drain mode? Reference manual
Looking at the Reference manual (Figure 15/16/17), this shouldn't be an issue?
Returning a tuple would require huge refactoring, since it must be guaranteed to consume the correct two values on into_... function calls, and thus I think its not in the scope of this pull request.
But I could see one being interested to also
impl InputPin for $PXi<Output<OpenDrain>>
- what do you think @japaric ?For this crate, only interested in supporting the stm32f103xx family, this should be an issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hardware abstracion is about to use the same driver implementation on any microcontroller, which is valid target for rust. OutputPin trait is declared in hal::digital::OutputPin, which is not STM specific. that is why I'm not sure that is_high(), is_low() should be part of OutputPin...
But
impl InputPin for $PXi<Output<OpenDrain>>
is not a bad idea on platforms which support it.