Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New dependency and nest constraint semantics development (PR v2) #202

Open
wants to merge 168 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jdsteve2
Copy link
Collaborator

@jdsteve2 jdsteve2 commented Jan 25, 2021

This branch accumulates changes related to the updates to the loopy dependency and loop-prioritization semantics.

Moved to github from from old gitlab MR.

Next pull request to merge into this branch: Statement instance order and lex order map

Note: A previous PR merging the same branch was created before. This one replaced it after @jdsteve2 could not determine the cause of a merging issue.

Subsumed by #479.

…roved algorithm for LexSchedule creation so that integer lex dims are not incremented unnecessarily when a block of code didn't contain any statements; fixed minor bugs in LexSchedule/item str methods; extracted only code related to LexSchedule/map creation (removed dependency stuff, for example) to shrink scope of this MR
inducer and others added 5 commits September 4, 2020 06:54
…nest-constraint-semantics-development'

LexSchedule and Map Creation

See merge request inducer/loopy!384
…t' of gitlab.tiker.net:inducer/loopy into new-dependency-and-nest-constraint-semantics-development
@jdsteve2 jdsteve2 changed the title New dependency and nest constraint semantics development (2) New dependency and nest constraint semantics development (PR v2) Jan 25, 2021
@jdsteve2 jdsteve2 marked this pull request as draft January 25, 2021 09:14
Base automatically changed from master to main March 8, 2021 05:10
@jdsteve2 jdsteve2 marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2021 23:54
@jdsteve2 jdsteve2 marked this pull request as draft July 23, 2021 23:54
@jdsteve2 jdsteve2 marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2021 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants