Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scaling tool to improve LP matrix #822

Draft
wants to merge 34 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ywpratama
Copy link

This branch contains the files and MESSAGE model updates to allow the model to run with an improved LP matrix.
A tutorial is provided in message_ix/tools/make_scaler directory, but the text still needs some edits to improve clarity.

Exclusion of unrelated changes, e.g., recursive dynamics and learning commits, are also required before integration with IIASA's main branch.

How to review

  • Please check out this branch and try to work with this tool
  • Write comment to report any bugs or improvement suggestions

PR checklist

  • Continuous integration checks all ✅
  • Add or expand tests; coverage checks both ✅
  • Add, expand, or update documentation.
  • Update release notes.

ywpratama and others added 30 commits March 7, 2023 15:50
Updates on recursive dynamic development in MESSAGE and a Fix for No-"CAP_NEW" bug in the "model_learningeos.gms"
This tutorial show how user can activate/deactivate recursive dynamic module in MESSAGE
This tutorial shows how to add new technology (DACCS) to a MESSAGE model/scenario. In this example, we use the Westeros emissions bound scenario as baseline
Next step is further documentation on the tool
@ywpratama ywpratama requested a review from macflo8 April 18, 2024 13:57
@glatterf42
Copy link
Member

Thanks for this PR, @ywpratama :)
One thing to note right away: please keep the existing file structure intact. We want all tutorials to be available under tutorial/wherever they belong, so please add your tutorial there, too, instead of in some random location.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants