Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Init buildbot-nix with x86_64-linux worker #147

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

steveej
Copy link
Member

@steveej steveej commented Sep 26, 2024

@r-vdp
Copy link
Collaborator

r-vdp commented Sep 26, 2024

The flake lock changes are a bit suspicious, I thought I already bumped those inputs.
Is this due to a rebase that undid some of those bumps?

@steveej
Copy link
Member Author

steveej commented Sep 26, 2024

The flake lock changes are a bit suspicious, I thought I already bumped those inputs. Is this due to a rebase that undid some of those bumps?

this branch isn't rebased on develop (yet). i only opened the PR to test buildbot-nix webhooks and builds.

i was going to finish #143 and then rebase this PR. now that you closed that without merging, how do you want to proceed here?

@r-vdp
Copy link
Collaborator

r-vdp commented Sep 26, 2024

I didn't close it, I thought you did.

Probably github did that instead of changing the base branch?

I think we can just reopen it.

@steveej steveej force-pushed the init-buildbot-nix branch 4 times, most recently from 849ec64 to 36b22d7 Compare September 26, 2024 20:45
@steveej steveej changed the title Init buildbot nix Init buildbot-nix with x86_64-linux worker Sep 26, 2024
@steveej steveej requested a review from r-vdp September 26, 2024 20:48
@steveej steveej force-pushed the init-buildbot-nix branch 6 times, most recently from 6c427d6 to 8ed18d4 Compare September 28, 2024 18:07
@steveej steveej merged commit b8257f4 into develop Oct 2, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants