-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: added e2e tests for multiple users across various tiers #3190
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
test: added e2e tests for multiple users across various tiers #3190
Conversation
Test Results 22 files + 4 290 suites +37 36m 13s ⏱️ + 6m 47s For more details on these failures, see this check. Results for commit 7d2ca9e. ± Comparison against base commit 0e31b34. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
a409ddb
to
5cf6d5c
Compare
const accountCreatedResult = await createAliasAndAssociateSpendingPlan( | ||
subscriptionTier as SubscriptionTier, | ||
); | ||
accountPlanObject[subscriptionTier].push(accountCreatedResult); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We also want to confirm that multiple accounts can be associated with the same HbarSpendingPlan
, contributing to a common shared budget
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yeah good point!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@victor-yanev added coverage to confirm the above! Good catch!
Signed-off-by: Logan Nguyen <[email protected]>
5cf6d5c
to
1b544d8
Compare
Signed-off-by: Logan Nguyen <[email protected]>
…re the same budget Signed-off-by: Logan Nguyen <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A quick question around the Utils.wait
.
Signed-off-by: Logan Nguyen <[email protected]>
Quality Gate failedFailed conditions |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3190 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 83.16% 83.17%
=======================================
Files 66 66
Lines 4312 4314 +2
Branches 843 843
=======================================
+ Hits 3586 3588 +2
Misses 483 483
Partials 243 243
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LG
Description:
This PR adds e2e tests for multiple users across various tiers
Related issue(s):
Fixes #3068
Notes for reviewer:
Checklist