Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update play-json to 2.10.0-RC9 #481

Closed

Conversation

scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor

@scala-steward scala-steward commented Jun 5, 2023

About this PR

πŸ“¦ Updates com.typesafe.play:play-json from 2.10.0-RC7 to 2.10.0-RC9

πŸ“œ GitHub Release Notes - Version Diff

Usage

βœ… Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

βš™ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "com.typesafe.play", artifactId = "play-json" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "com.typesafe.play", artifactId = "play-json" }
}]
labels: library-update, early-semver-pre-release, semver-spec-pre-release, commit-count:1

@ybasket
Copy link
Collaborator

ybasket commented Sep 10, 2023

Play! JSON dropped Java 8, requiring 11+, hence we fail to compile. Unsure what's the best way forward here, dropping Java 8 for fs2-data as a whole, dropping it for Play! JSON integration, dropping the integration itself.

@scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #525.

@scala-steward scala-steward deleted the update/play-json-2.10.0-RC9 branch September 18, 2023 21:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants