Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't gate request query strings and form data behind send_default_pii #2452

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 6.0-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sl0thentr0py
Copy link
Member

@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py commented Oct 31, 2024

This makes it consistent with behavior in other SDKs.
But since it changes behavior, we will release it as part of the next major.

@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py force-pushed the neel/fix-rails-pii-params branch from 78c4fe5 to f1c1f1f Compare October 31, 2024 13:14
@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py requested a review from solnic October 31, 2024 13:15
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.06%. Comparing base (913c75e) to head (c6d6137).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           6.0-dev    #2452      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    97.94%   98.06%   +0.12%     
===========================================
  Files          126      126              
  Lines         4714     4708       -6     
===========================================
  Hits          4617     4617              
+ Misses          97       91       -6     
Components Coverage Δ
sentry-ruby 98.47% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
sentry-rails 96.72% <ø> (+0.46%) ⬆️
sentry-sidekiq 97.63% <ø> (+1.89%) ⬆️
sentry-resque 91.42% <ø> (-1.43%) ⬇️
sentry-delayed_job 95.65% <ø> (ø)
sentry-opentelemetry 99.31% <ø> (ø)
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
sentry-ruby/lib/sentry/faraday.rb 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
sentry-ruby/lib/sentry/interfaces/request.rb 95.08% <100.00%> (-0.08%) ⬇️
sentry-ruby/lib/sentry/net/http.rb 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
sentry-ruby/lib/sentry/utils/http_tracing.rb 100.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py removed the request for review from solnic October 31, 2024 13:18
@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py marked this pull request as draft October 31, 2024 13:18
@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py force-pushed the neel/fix-rails-pii-params branch 3 times, most recently from 55bbe4d to ca51cc7 Compare October 31, 2024 13:51
@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py force-pushed the neel/fix-rails-pii-params branch from ca51cc7 to c6d6137 Compare October 31, 2024 14:03
@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py requested a review from solnic October 31, 2024 14:07
@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2024 14:07
@sl0thentr0py
Copy link
Member Author

The failing test seems to be about new behavior rails 7.2 and will be fixed separately

@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py requested a review from st0012 October 31, 2024 14:08
@cleptric
Copy link
Member

Query strings should not be guarded by send_default_pii, but it should still apply for the request body. https://develop.sentry.dev/sdk/expected-features/data-handling/#sensitive-data

@sl0thentr0py sl0thentr0py marked this pull request as draft October 31, 2024 14:42
Copy link
Collaborator

@st0012 st0012 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also think send_default_pii should be applied to body.

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ def record_sentry_breadcrumb(request_info, response_status)
level: :info,
category: self.class::BREADCRUMB_CATEGORY,
type: :info,
data: { status: response_status, **request_info }
data: { status: response_status, **request_info.compact }
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, this should be called at the caller's extract_request_info helpers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants