Prepare release @getodk/web-forms 0.4.0

[sadiqkhoja]

What's changed

• Ran changeset version command and updated description in changelog to removed trigger from Unsupported nodes
• Fixed feature matrix rendering, it had become quite ugly
• Updated feature matrix to mark trigger as WIP

Before:

After:

I have verified this PR works in these browsers (latest versions):

• Chrome
• Firefox
• Safari (macOS)
• Safari (iOS)
• Not applicable

What else has been done to verify that this works as intended?

NA

Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?

I can move feature matrix rendering from this PR. I tried various things to fix alignment of the headings but nothing seems to work. I ended up added hard coded spacing between category heading and progress-bar (don't want to spend to much time here)

How does this change affect users? Describe intentional changes to behavior and behavior that could have accidentally been affected by code changes. In other words, what are the regression risks?

None

Do we need any specific form for testing your changes? If so, please attach one.

NA

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 454b901

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[eyelidlessness]

I thought I'd take a quick look at maybe simplifying the alignment. I suspect another unit besides mm might be computable. But I don't know LaTeX, and neither does preview in VSCode. So I'm gonna keep treating the feature matrix stuff as kind of a black box to me.

On Slack we discussed maybe paring down the complexity in the feature matrix. I'm looking forward to ideas on that.

Otherwise LGTM. Let's ship it! 🚀

[sadiqkhoja]

Created #221 to iterate on feature-matrix in README