fix: layout issue vendor dashboard withdraw menu using the RTL language #2519
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request addresses a layout issue in the Dokan plugin's vendor dashboard withdrawal menu for RTL (right-to-left) languages. The changes involve modifying the CSS in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
TanvirHasan19
added
Needs: Testing
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
assets/css/rtl.css (3)
240-248: Consider using Flexbox for more robust positioningThe current implementation uses absolute positioning with hardcoded values, which can be fragile across different viewport sizes and content lengths. Consider using Flexbox for better maintainability and responsiveness.
-.dokan-withdraw-content .dokan-withdraw-area .dokan-panel-body .dokan-panel-inner-container .dokan-w5 { - position: absolute; - right: 80%!important; - top: 50%; - transform: translate(10px, -50%); - width: 20%!important; - float: right!important; -} +.dokan-withdraw-content .dokan-withdraw-area .dokan-panel-body .dokan-panel-inner-container { + display: flex; + align-items: center; + justify-content: space-between; +} +.dokan-withdraw-content .dokan-withdraw-area .dokan-panel-body .dokan-panel-inner-container .dokan-w5 { + width: 20%; + margin-right: auto; +}
249-251: Remove unnecessary float with Flexbox layoutThe use of
floatwith!importantindicates specificity issues. This can be eliminated by using Flexbox for alignment.-.dokan-withdraw-content .dokan-withdraw-area .dokan-panel-body .dokan-panel-inner-container .dokan-w5 a { - float: left!important; -} +.dokan-withdraw-content .dokan-withdraw-area .dokan-panel-body .dokan-panel-inner-container .dokan-w5 { + display: flex; + justify-content: flex-end; +}
240-260: Consider modernizing the layout approachThe current changes rely heavily on absolute positioning and floats, which are older CSS techniques. A more modern approach using Flexbox would:
- Eliminate the need for absolute positioning
- Remove dependencies on hardcoded values
- Improve maintainability
- Better handle responsive layouts
- Reduce the need for !important declarations
Would you like me to provide a complete example of how to refactor this using Flexbox?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
assets/css/rtl.css(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: e2e tests (3, 3)
- GitHub Check: e2e tests (2, 3)
- GitHub Check: e2e tests (1, 3)
- GitHub Check: api tests (1, 1)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
assets/css/rtl.css (3)
255-257: Alignment handled by previous Flexbox suggestionThis float declaration would be unnecessary with the proposed Flexbox layout.
258-260: Alignment handled by previous Flexbox suggestionThis float declaration would be unnecessary with the proposed Flexbox layout.
252-254: Verify responsive behavior with 100% widthSetting a fixed 100% width with
!importantmight override responsive layouts. Please verify this doesn't break the layout on smaller screens.✅ Verification successful
100% width usage is safe in this context
The width:100% with !important is acceptable here as the content area is part of a flex-based dashboard layout system. The style won't break responsiveness since:
- Parent container uses flexbox layout
- No conflicting responsive styles were found
- Dashboard implements a proper responsive grid system
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for responsive styles or media queries that might conflict rg -B 2 -A 2 "\.content-area\s*{[^}]*width:" --type css rg -B 5 -A 5 "@media.*\.content-area" --type cssLength of output: 238
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for content-area styles rg "content-area" --type css -B 2 -A 2 # Search specifically for media queries rg "@media.*content-area" --type css -B 2 -A 2 # Search for any responsive utilities rg "responsive|mobile|tablet" --type css -B 2 -A 2 | rg -B 2 -A 2 "content-area|width"Length of output: 101491
All Submissions:
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Related Pull Request(s)
Closes
How to test the changes in this Pull Request:
Changelog entry
Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.
Before Changes
Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).
After Changes
Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).
Feature Video (optional)
Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.
PR Self Review Checklist:
FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:
Summary by CodeRabbit