-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 675
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support overriding task pod_template via with_overrides #6118
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Nelson Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nelson Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nelson Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nelson Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nelson Chen <[email protected]>
#take |
Signed-off-by: Nelson Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nelson Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nelson Chen <[email protected]>
Code Review Agent Run #9af1d5Actionable Suggestions - 7
Review Details
|
Changelist by BitoThis pull request implements the following key changes.
|
t.Run("Test_enable-distributed-error-aggregation", func(t *testing.T) { | ||
|
||
t.Run("Override", func(t *testing.T) { | ||
testValue := "1" | ||
|
||
cmdFlags.Set("enable-distributed-error-aggregation", testValue) | ||
if vBool, err := cmdFlags.GetBool("enable-distributed-error-aggregation"); err == nil { | ||
testDecodeJson_K8sPluginConfig(t, fmt.Sprintf("%v", vBool), &actual.EnableDistributedErrorAggregation) | ||
|
||
} else { | ||
assert.FailNow(t, err.Error()) | ||
} | ||
}) | ||
}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding test cases for both true
and false
values for the enable-distributed-error-aggregation
flag to ensure proper boolean parsing behavior.
Code suggestion
Check the AI-generated fix before applying
@@ -382,14 +382,40 @@ func TestK8sPluginConfig_SetFlags(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("Test_enable-distributed-error-aggregation", func(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("Override with 1", func(t *testing.T) {
testValue := "1"
cmdFlags.Set("enable-distributed-error-aggregation", testValue)
if vBool, err := cmdFlags.GetBool("enable-distributed-error-aggregation"); err == nil {
testDecodeJson_K8sPluginConfig(t, fmt.Sprintf("%v", vBool), &actual.EnableDistributedErrorAggregation)
} else {
assert.FailNow(t, err.Error())
}
})
t.Run("Override with true", func(t *testing.T) {
testValue := "true"
cmdFlags.Set("enable-distributed-error-aggregation", testValue)
if vBool, err := cmdFlags.GetBool("enable-distributed-error-aggregation"); err == nil {
testDecodeJson_K8sPluginConfig(t, fmt.Sprintf("%v", vBool), &actual.EnableDistributedErrorAggregation)
} else {
assert.FailNow(t, err.Error())
}
})
t.Run("Override with false", func(t *testing.T) {
testValue := "false"
cmdFlags.Set("enable-distributed-error-aggregation", testValue)
if vBool, err := cmdFlags.GetBool("enable-distributed-error-aggregation"); err == nil {
testDecodeJson_K8sPluginConfig(t, fmt.Sprintf("%v", vBool), &actual.EnableDistributedErrorAggregation)
} else {
assert.FailNow(t, err.Error())
}
})
})
Code Review Run #9af1d5
Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?
- it was incorrectly flagged
flyteidl/gen/pb-js/flyteidl.d.ts
Outdated
@@ -6953,6 +6959,9 @@ export namespace flyteidl { | |||
|
|||
/** K8sPod dataConfig */ | |||
dataConfig?: (flyteidl.core.IDataLoadingConfig|null); | |||
|
|||
/** K8sPod primaryContainerName */ | |||
primaryContainerName?: (string|null); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider making primaryContainerName
required instead of optional since it appears to be a critical field for K8sPod configuration. The interface shows it as optional with ?
but the class implementation has it as required. A similar issue was also found in flyteidl/gen/pb-js/flyteidl.d.ts (line 6985-6986).
Code suggestion
Check the AI-generated fix before applying
primaryContainerName?: (string|null); | |
primaryContainerName: string; |
Code Review Run #9af1d5
Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?
- it was incorrectly flagged
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ func buildNodeSpec(n *core.Node, tasks []*core.CompiledTask, errs errors.Compile | |||
var resources *core.Resources | |||
var extendedResources *v1alpha1.ExtendedResources | |||
var containerImage string | |||
var podtemplate *core.K8SPod |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider initializing the podtemplate
variable with a default value to avoid potential nil pointer dereference issues.
Code suggestion
Check the AI-generated fix before applying
var podtemplate *core.K8SPod | |
var podtemplate *core.K8SPod = &core.K8SPod{} |
Code Review Run #9af1d5
Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?
- it was incorrectly flagged
if overrides.GetPodTemplate() != nil { | ||
podtemplate = overrides.GetPodTemplate() | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding validation for podtemplate
before assignment. The current code directly assigns the pod template without any validation which could lead to issues if an invalid template is provided.
Code suggestion
Check the AI-generated fix before applying
if overrides.GetPodTemplate() != nil { | |
podtemplate = overrides.GetPodTemplate() | |
} | |
if template := overrides.GetPodTemplate(); template != nil { | |
if err := validatePodTemplate(template); err != nil { | |
return nil, err | |
} | |
podtemplate = template | |
} |
Code Review Run #9af1d5
Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?
- it was incorrectly flagged
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ func RunPluginEndToEndTest(t *testing.T, executor pluginCore.Plugin, template *i | |||
}) | |||
overrides.OnGetExtendedResources().Return(&idlCore.ExtendedResources{}) | |||
overrides.OnGetContainerImage().Return("") | |||
overrides.OnGetPodTemplate().Return(&idlCore.K8SPod{}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding error handling for the mock return value setup. The OnGetPodTemplate()
call may need error handling to properly simulate failure scenarios.
Code suggestion
Check the AI-generated fix before applying
overrides.OnGetPodTemplate().Return(&idlCore.K8SPod{}) | |
overrides.OnGetPodTemplate().Return(&idlCore.K8SPod{}, nil) |
Code Review Run #9af1d5
Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?
- it was incorrectly flagged
Signed-off-by: Nelson Chen <[email protected]>
Code Review Agent Run #81015aActionable Suggestions - 0Additional Suggestions - 10
Review Details
|
// Override for the pod template used by task pods | ||
K8sPod pod_template = 4; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// Override for the pod template used by task pods | |
K8sPod pod_template = 4; | |
// Override for the pod template used by task pods. | |
//+optional | |
K8sPod pod_template = 4; |
@@ -286,6 +286,13 @@ func BuildRawPod(ctx context.Context, tCtx pluginsCore.TaskExecutionContext) (*v | |||
*c, | |||
}, | |||
} | |||
if tCtx.TaskExecutionMetadata().GetOverrides().GetPodTemplate() != nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: could we create a variable for podTemplate here? like
podTemplate := tCtx.TaskExecutionMetadata().GetOverrides().GetPodTemplate
if podTemplate != nil {
...
}
if podtemplate.Metadata.Labels != nil { | ||
mergeMapInto(podtemplate.Metadata.Labels, objectMeta.Labels) | ||
} | ||
var podspec_override *v1.PodSpec |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
var podspec_override *v1.PodSpec | |
var podpec_override *v1.PodSpec |
@@ -2022,7 +2023,7 @@ func TestMergeWithBasePodTemplate(t *testing.T) { | |||
taskReader.On("Read", mock.Anything).Return(task, nil) | |||
|
|||
tCtx := &pluginsCoreMock.TaskExecutionContext{} | |||
tCtx.OnTaskExecutionMetadata().Return(dummyTaskExecutionMetadata(&v1.ResourceRequirements{}, nil, "")) | |||
tCtx.OnTaskExecutionMetadata().Return(dummyTaskExecutionMetadata(&v1.ResourceRequirements{}, nil, "", nil)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you add a test that has a podTemplate
in the dummyTaskExecution?
@@ -446,6 +453,25 @@ func ApplyContainerImageOverride(podSpec *v1.PodSpec, containerImage string, pri | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func ApplyPodTemplateOverride(podSpec *v1.PodSpec, objectMeta metav1.ObjectMeta, podtemplate *core.K8SPod) (*v1.PodSpec, metav1.ObjectMeta, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
func ApplyPodTemplateOverride(podSpec *v1.PodSpec, objectMeta metav1.ObjectMeta, podtemplate *core.K8SPod) (*v1.PodSpec, metav1.ObjectMeta, error) { | |
func ApplyPodTemplateOverride(podSpec *v1.PodSpec, objectMeta metav1.ObjectMeta, podTemplate *core.K8SPod) (*v1.PodSpec, metav1.ObjectMeta, error) { |
Tracking issue
Related to #5683
Why are the changes needed?
If we can support pod_template in with_overrides, this would reduce a lot of toil since we can supply pod templates in a central location and override downstream tasks, similar to how we can do so for resources.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We can use with_override() to override podtemplate, just like resources.
How was this patch tested?
Excute a workflow and using with_override(pod_template=PodTemplate(xxx)) to override the default podtemplate
Setup process
I ran flyte on my local machine and tested my code with this workflow and task:
Screenshots
Check all the applicable boxes
Related PRs
Docs link
Summary by Bito
This PR implements pod template override functionality with with_overrides() method and updates across the Flyte ecosystem (v1.14.0 to v1.14.1). Key features include primary_container_name field in K8sPod, pod_template in TaskNodeOverrides, and workflow node metadata support. The implementation spans multiple languages with protobuf definitions, enabling centralized pod template specification with downstream task override capability. Additional improvements include new resource management configurations, enhanced error handling, and a new DataMode enum for ArrayNodes.Unit tests added: True
Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 5