-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 352
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix wallet scanning for newly created wallet #1508
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications to the wallet initialization and recovery processes in the application. A new Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/init.cpp (1)
948-950
: Fix typo in comment: 'scaning' should be 'scanning'.Please correct the spelling in the comment for clarity.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/init.cpp
(1 hunks)src/qt/recover.cpp
(1 hunks)src/wallet/wallet.cpp
(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/wallet/wallet.cpp
if (!(GetBoolArg("-newwallet", false))) {uiInterface.InitMessage(_("Rescanning..."));} | ||
nStart = GetTimeMillis(); | ||
walletInstance->ScanForWalletTransactions(pindexRescan, true, fRecoverMnemonic); | ||
LogPrintf(" rescan %15dms\n", GetTimeMillis() - nStart); | ||
if (!(GetBoolArg("-newwallet", false))) {LogPrintf(" rescan %15dms\n", GetTimeMillis() - nStart);} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the reason for making the messages conditional but not the actual operation itself?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The condition to prevent scanning if a new wallet has been created is placed inside the ScanForWalletTransactions function. This approach makes it easy to change the algorithm in the future without having to edit each function call. It also helps avoid code duplication and simplifies testing since all the logic is in one place.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok
if (!(GetBoolArg("-newwallet", false))) {uiInterface.InitMessage(_("Rescanning..."));} | ||
nStart = GetTimeMillis(); | ||
walletInstance->ScanForWalletTransactions(pindexRescan, true, fRecoverMnemonic); | ||
LogPrintf(" rescan %15dms\n", GetTimeMillis() - nStart); | ||
if (!(GetBoolArg("-newwallet", false))) {LogPrintf(" rescan %15dms\n", GetTimeMillis() - nStart);} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok
No description provided.