Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add decodingPairPool to nimble parallel writer #101

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

styoung89
Copy link

Summary: Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Meta Open Source bot. label Nov 5, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65379001

styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65379001

styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65379001

styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65379001

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65379001

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65379001

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65379001

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65379001

styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65379001

styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65379001

styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65379001

styoung89 pushed a commit to styoung89/nimble-1 that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
Summary:

Switching to pool model for parallelism. Instead of a single shared decodedvector and a single selectivityvector, we get a pair of decodedvector and selectivityvector that gets recycled back into a queue

Differential Revision: D65379001
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65379001

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Meta Open Source bot. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants