Allow different type lengths to be stored and loaded #197
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In a wasm context not all types are 256 bit like in evm. This would make easier to store smaller primitives (e.g. i32), since they would not require padding. The bigger win is when storing/retrieving dynamically sized arrays. Strings can be stored under a single key and do not require splitting up into smaller 32 byte chunks, and arrays do not need to store a size parameter. Signed-off-by: Sean Young <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In a wasm context not all types are 256 bit like in evm. This would make
easier to store smaller primitives (e.g. i32), since they would not
require padding.
The bigger win is when storing/retrieving dynamically sized arrays. Strings
can be stored under a single key and do not require splitting up into
smaller 32 byte chunks, and arrays do not need to store a size parameter.
Signed-off-by: Sean Young [email protected]
Note this is how I've started implementing storage in solang: https://github.com/hyperledger-labs/solang and this works much better than the U256 values.