Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link bytecode using references #312

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arthcp
Copy link
Contributor

@arthcp arthcp commented Dec 4, 2018

Support to provide linkReferences as optional third parameter for linkBytecode. If it is not provided then findLinkReferences is used to find it. If library name is not present in linkReferences then it falls back to manual search.

Fixes #193

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 4, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 84.651% when pulling 954e6f9 on arthcp:link-bytecode-using-references into fc232fe on ethereum:master.

@axic axic force-pushed the link-bytecode-using-references branch from b9f2779 to be228e6 Compare July 4, 2019 11:32
@axic axic force-pushed the link-bytecode-using-references branch 2 times, most recently from 9232d1a to 8dbd9a4 Compare November 6, 2019 10:13
@axic axic force-pushed the link-bytecode-using-references branch from 8dbd9a4 to 8cc1dee Compare November 26, 2019 15:27
@r0qs r0qs self-assigned this Oct 3, 2022
@r0qs r0qs force-pushed the link-bytecode-using-references branch from d8c2553 to 01dd7ca Compare October 4, 2022 11:22
linker.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
linker.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@cameel
Copy link
Member

cameel commented Nov 22, 2022

@r0qs I see there's a merge commit. Can you rebase it on top of master instead?

@r0qs r0qs force-pushed the link-bytecode-using-references branch from 01dd7ca to 7536d10 Compare November 26, 2022 16:04
@r0qs
Copy link
Member

r0qs commented Nov 26, 2022

@r0qs I see there's a merge commit. Can you rebase it on top of master instead?

Yes. I did it now, but as the commits were very old and the file structures changed significantly, the OP changes needed to be discarded during the rebase. However, I added the OP as a co-author of my changes, since I reused part of his solution.

@r0qs r0qs force-pushed the link-bytecode-using-references branch from 7536d10 to 954e6f9 Compare November 26, 2022 16:21
Copy link
Contributor

@matheusaaguiar matheusaaguiar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update linkBytecode to support linkReferences structure from jsonio
5 participants