-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix ErgoStateContextSpec Sporadic Failures #2116
Conversation
684da19
to
f1f3a5f
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Good catch! For
the issue is that
so when I think dedicated generator should be used for the check |
for
generation of test data here is good, as for |
It's This fails, too, there are two different sporadic failures. |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
@stenolog remove
and |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
c27ea5b
to
7c0b17f
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
src/test/scala/org/ergoplatform/nodeView/state/ErgoStateContextSpec.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/scala/org/ergoplatform/nodeView/state/ErgoStateContextSpec.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/scala/org/ergoplatform/nodeView/state/ErgoStateContextSpec.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/scala/org/ergoplatform/nodeView/state/ErgoStateContextSpec.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
8d933a6
to
f558fe2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think custom generators should be used , reiterating over extensionKvGen is messy . As your goal is to avoid specific key spaces anyway, better to do that directly
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
fix test 'valid application of correct extension' fix test 'validation of field value sizes'
closes #2114