-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add jupyter-describe function for interactive inspect #238
Open
non-Jedi
wants to merge
2
commits into
emacs-jupyter:master
Choose a base branch
from
non-Jedi:jupyter-describe
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should probably be using
completing-read
. Any idea why it was written this way instead?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I copied it over from
read--expression
called byeval-expression
(M-:
). My intention withjupyter-read-expression
is to parallelread--expression
. Alsocompleting-read
is more for completing collections right?jupyter-read-expression
is supposed to read a line of code for evaluation from the minibuffer while also allowing completion from the kernel within the line.Although the documentation for
jupyter-read-expression
does sayfor completion
instead of something more approriate likefor evalution
so its purpose isn't that clear.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm. That makes sense. So for this new purpose I'm putting this code to, using
completing-read
probably makes more sense, but it doesn't make sense in the context ofjupyter-read-expression
which is likely to complete multiple symbols. I think this is an acceptable hack though until I finish acompleting-read
based implementation (I started to do so over at non-Jedi@72b84b8, and it's probably only an hour or so more work on my part to finish, but with 2 young children in the house, I have no idea when I'll have time to finish)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In either case, I think it probably makes more sense to just refactor
jupyter-read-expression
to take optional parameters rather than define an internaljupyter--read-with-completion
. :/