Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add video learning event #163

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

Add video learning event #163

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

jo-elimu
Copy link
Member

@jo-elimu jo-elimu commented Sep 26, 2024

Refs #155

Purpose

Technical Details

Testing Instructions

Screenshots

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new broadcast receiver to handle video learning events.
    • Added a method to report video learning events, enhancing analytics capabilities.
  • Updates

    • Updated application version to 3.1.22-SNAPSHOT.
    • Updated dependencies for the model library to version 2.0.74.
    • Expanded database schema to include multiple learning event types, including VideoLearningEvent.

@jo-elimu jo-elimu requested a review from a team as a code owner September 26, 2024 13:27
@jo-elimu jo-elimu linked an issue Sep 26, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
9 tasks
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to versioning in both the app/build.gradle and utils/build.gradle files, where the versionCode and versionName have been incremented. A new broadcast receiver, VideoLearningEventReceiver, has been added to the AndroidManifest.xml, along with its implementation in a new Java class. This receiver is designed to handle video learning events, enhancing the application's capabilities in this area. Additionally, a new entity for VideoLearningEvent has been created in the Room database, along with the necessary migration strategy.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/build.gradle Updated versionCode from 3001021 to 3001022, versionName from "3.1.21" to "3.1.22-SNAPSHOT", and dependency from model-2.0.73 to model-2.0.74.
app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml Added new broadcast receiver VideoLearningEventReceiver with intent filter for ai.elimu.intent.action.VIDEO_LEARNING_EVENT.
app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/db/RoomDb.java Updated database version to 7, added VideoLearningEvent entity, and implemented migration strategy MIGRATION_6_7.
app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/entity/VideoLearningEvent.java Introduced VideoLearningEvent class with fields for video ID, title, and learning event type.
app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/receiver/VideoLearningEventReceiver.java Introduced VideoLearningEventReceiver class to handle broadcast intents and log relevant information.
utils/build.gradle Updated versionName in defaultConfig from "3.1.21" to "3.1.22-SNAPSHOT" and dependency from model-2.0.73 to model-2.0.74.
utils/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/utils/LearningEventUtil.java Added method reportVideoLearningEvent to report video learning events via broadcast intent.
app/schemas/ai.elimu.analytics.db.RoomDb/7.json Introduced schema version 7 defining tables for various learning events, including VideoLearningEvent.

Possibly related issues

  • Add VideoLearningEvent #155: This issue discusses adding a VideoLearningEvent, which aligns with the new VideoLearningEventReceiver introduced in this PR.

Possibly related PRs

  • Release 3.1.20 #158: This PR involves an update to the versionCode and versionName in the app/build.gradle file, which is directly related to the versioning changes made in the main PR.
  • chore: release 3.1.21 #160: This PR modifies the versionName and updates the dependency for the elimu-ai:model library in app/build.gradle, aligning with the changes made in the main PR.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jo-elimu jo-elimu self-assigned this Sep 26, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/receiver/VideoLearningEventReceiver.java (2)

15-34: LGTM: Intent data extraction and logging.

The onReceive method correctly extracts relevant information from the intent and logs it using Timber. The conversion of the learning event type string to an enum is handled properly.

Consider adding error handling for intent extras.

While the current implementation works, it doesn't handle potential null or invalid values from the intent. Consider adding null checks and providing default values where appropriate.

Here's a suggested improvement for error handling:

- String packageName = intent.getStringExtra("packageName");
+ String packageName = intent.getStringExtra("packageName");
+ if (packageName == null) {
+     Timber.w("Package name is null");
+     packageName = "unknown";
+ }
Timber.i("packageName: \"" + packageName + "\"");

// Similar null checks for other string extras

- Long videoId = intent.getLongExtra("videoId", 0);
+ long videoId = intent.getLongExtra("videoId", -1);
+ if (videoId == -1) {
+     Timber.w("Invalid video ID received");
+ }
Timber.i("videoId: " + videoId);

// ... (other extractions)

- LearningEventType learningEventType = LearningEventType.valueOf(learningEventTypeAsString);
+ LearningEventType learningEventType;
+ try {
+     learningEventType = LearningEventType.valueOf(learningEventTypeAsString);
+ } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
+     Timber.e(e, "Invalid learning event type: %s", learningEventTypeAsString);
+     learningEventType = LearningEventType.UNKNOWN; // Assuming you have an UNKNOWN type
+ }
Timber.i("learningEventType: " + learningEventType);

35-37: TODO comments need to be addressed.

There are two TODO comments indicating incomplete implementation:

  1. Creating a new VideoLearningEvent
  2. Storing the event in a database

These tasks are crucial for the full functionality of this receiver. Please implement these features or create separate issues to track them if they're out of scope for this PR.

Would you like me to help create GitHub issues for these TODO items or provide sample code for implementing them?

app/build.gradle (2)

11-11: Version name update is appropriate, but consider removing "-SNAPSHOT" for release.

The version name has been correctly incremented to match the version code change. The "-SNAPSHOT" suffix appropriately indicates that this is a development version.

Remember to remove the "-SNAPSHOT" suffix before the final release of this version.


Line range hint 1-67: Overall, the changes in this file look good, but the PR description needs improvement.

The version updates and dependency changes are consistent with adding a new feature for video learning events. However, the PR description lacks details about these changes and how to test them.

Please update the PR description to include:

  1. A summary of the changes made in this file.
  2. The reason for updating the model dependency.
  3. Instructions for testing the new video learning event feature.
  4. Any potential impacts on existing functionality due to these changes.

This will help reviewers and future maintainers better understand the context and purpose of these changes.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cfc8e49 and 1b4de73.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • app/build.gradle (2 hunks)
  • app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml (1 hunks)
  • app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/receiver/VideoLearningEventReceiver.java (1 hunks)
  • utils/build.gradle (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
utils/build.gradle (3)

28-28: Dependency update approved, verify compatibility.

The update of the elimu-ai:model dependency from version 2.0.73 to 2.0.74 is noted. This minor version update may introduce new features or bug fixes.

To ensure smooth integration:

  1. Review the changelog or release notes for elimu-ai:model version 2.0.74 to understand the changes.
  2. Test the project thoroughly with this new dependency version to catch any potential compatibility issues.
  3. Run the following script to check for any other occurrences of the old version:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for old dependency versions

# Test: Search for old version of elimu-ai:model
echo "Searching for old version of elimu-ai:model:"
rg --type gradle 'com\.github\.elimu-ai:model:model-2\.0\.73'

39-39: Publishing version update approved, verify artifact generation.

The version update in the publishing section from "3.1.21" to "3.1.22-SNAPSHOT" is consistent with the earlier versionName change. This ensures that the correct version is used when publishing the artifact.

To ensure the publishing process works correctly with the new version:

  1. Verify that the artifact is generated with the correct name: utils-3.1.22-SNAPSHOT-release.aar
  2. Test the publishing process in a staging environment if available.
  3. Run the following script to check the consistency of version strings:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for version consistency in build.gradle

# Test: Compare versionName and publishing version
echo "Comparing versionName and publishing version:"
grep -n 'versionName' utils/build.gradle
grep -n 'version' utils/build.gradle | grep -v 'versionName'

12-12: Version update looks good, verify related configurations.

The version update from "3.1.21" to "3.1.22-SNAPSHOT" follows semantic versioning principles and indicates a development version. This change is consistent with the project's versioning strategy.

Please ensure that this version update is reflected in other relevant files and configurations. Run the following script to check for any inconsistencies:

app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/receiver/VideoLearningEventReceiver.java (3)

1-11: LGTM: Imports and package declaration are appropriate.

The imports cover all necessary components for the implementation, including Android-specific classes, Java utilities, a custom enum for learning event types, and Timber for logging. The use of Timber for logging is a good practice in Android development.


12-15: LGTM: Class declaration and structure are correct.

The VideoLearningEventReceiver class properly extends BroadcastReceiver and overrides the onReceive method, which is the correct implementation for an Android broadcast receiver. The class name is descriptive and follows Java naming conventions.


1-39: Overall implementation review and next steps.

The VideoLearningEventReceiver provides a good foundation for handling video learning events. However, there are a few areas that need attention:

  1. Implement error handling for intent extras as suggested earlier.
  2. Complete the TODO items: create the VideoLearningEvent object and implement database storage.
  3. Ensure that this receiver is properly registered in the AndroidManifest.xml file.
  4. Consider adding unit tests for this receiver to verify its behavior with different intent inputs.

Additionally, it would be helpful to document the expected intent structure (required extras and their types) either in code comments or in the project documentation to assist other developers who might send intents to this receiver.

To verify the proper registration of this receiver, please run the following command:

This will help ensure that the new receiver is correctly integrated into the application.

✅ Verification successful

VideoLearningEventReceiver Registration Verified.

The VideoLearningEventReceiver is properly registered in the AndroidManifest.xml file at line 70.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if VideoLearningEventReceiver is properly registered in AndroidManifest.xml

grep -n "VideoLearningEventReceiver" app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml

Length of output: 142

app/build.gradle (2)

10-10: Version code increment looks good.

The version code has been properly incremented from 3001021 to 3001022, which is consistent with adding a new feature as described in the PR objectives.


43-43: Dependency update looks good, but verify compatibility.

The update of the 'com.github.elimu-ai:model' dependency from version 2.0.73 to 2.0.74 is likely related to the new video learning event feature.

Please ensure that this update is compatible with the new feature and doesn't introduce any breaking changes. Run the following script to check for any potential issues:

After running these checks, please thoroughly test the integration to ensure everything works as expected with the new model version.

✅ Verification successful

Dependency update verified and no issues found.

The update of the 'com.github.elimu-ai:model' dependency to version 2.0.74 does not introduce any apparent compatibility or breaking changes based on the current analysis.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential breaking changes in the model dependency update

# Test: Search for usages of classes or methods from the model library
rg --type java -g '!build/' 'import.*ai\.elimu\.model'

# Test: Check if there are any TODO or FIXME comments related to the model update
rg --type java -g '!build/' '(TODO|FIXME).*model'

# Test: Look for any error handling related to the model classes
rg --type java -g '!build/' 'catch.*model'

Length of output: 4544

app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml (1)

70-76: ⚠️ Potential issue

Consistent declaration, but consider security implications

The new VideoLearningEventReceiver declaration follows the established pattern in the manifest, which is good for consistency. However, there are some security considerations to address:

  1. The receiver is exported (android:exported="true"), which means any app on the device can send intents to it. This could pose a security risk if not properly protected.

  2. Unlike some other receivers in this file (e.g., LetterLearningEventReceiver), there's no visible custom permission requirement for sending intents to this receiver.

To mitigate potential security risks, consider the following:

  1. Add a custom permission requirement for this receiver, similar to other receivers in the file. For example:
<permission android:name="${applicationId}.permission.SEND_VIDEO_LEARNING_EVENT" />

Then, add the permission to the receiver:

<receiver android:name=".receiver.VideoLearningEventReceiver"
    android:enabled="true"
    android:exported="true"
    android:permission="${applicationId}.permission.SEND_VIDEO_LEARNING_EVENT">
    <!-- ... -->
</receiver>
  1. Ensure that the VideoLearningEventReceiver implementation properly validates incoming intents and handles them securely.

To verify the implementation of the new receiver:

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Sep 26, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
utils/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/utils/LearningEventUtil.java (1)

97-114: LGTM: Implementation of reportVideoLearningEvent method.

The new reportVideoLearningEvent method is well-implemented and consistent with other methods in the class. It correctly handles the reporting of video learning events.

For consistency with other methods, consider adding a blank line after the log statement on line 104:

 public static void reportVideoLearningEvent(VideoGson videoGson, LearningEventType learningEventType, Context context, String analyticsApplicationId) {
     Log.i(LearningEventUtil.class.getName(),"reportVideoLearningEvent");
+
     Intent broadcastIntent = new Intent();
     // ... rest of the method
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b4de73 and c7906d1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • utils/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/utils/LearningEventUtil.java (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
utils/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/utils/LearningEventUtil.java (2)

14-14: LGTM: Import statement for VideoGson.

The import statement for VideoGson is correctly added and follows the existing pattern for other Gson classes in the file.


Line range hint 1-114: Summary: Addition of video learning event reporting.

The changes to LearningEventUtil.java successfully introduce the capability to report video learning events. The new reportVideoLearningEvent method is well-integrated into the existing class structure and follows the established patterns for other learning event types.

These changes enhance the analytics capabilities of the application by allowing it to track and report video-based learning activities, which aligns with the PR objective of adding video learning event support.

To ensure the new functionality is properly integrated, please run the following verification script:

This script will help verify that:

  1. The new method is being called from appropriate places in the codebase.
  2. The VIDEO_LEARNING_EVENT action is properly registered in the AndroidManifest.xml.
  3. There are no remaining TODO comments related to video learning that might indicate incomplete implementation.

Please review the results of this script to ensure the new functionality is fully integrated.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Sep 27, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/db/RoomDb.java (1)

128-137: LGTM: MIGRATION_6_7 implementation with a suggestion.

The MIGRATION_6_7 strategy is well-implemented:

  1. It correctly creates the 'VideoLearningEvent' table with appropriate columns and types.
  2. The migration is logged using Timber, which is good for debugging.

Consider adding error handling to the migration process. While Room generally handles SQLite exceptions, explicit error handling can provide more detailed logging and potential recovery strategies. For example:

 private static final Migration MIGRATION_6_7 = new Migration(6, 7) {
     @Override
     public void migrate(@NonNull SupportSQLiteDatabase database) {
         Timber.i("migrate (" + database.getVersion() + " --> 7)");

         String sql = "CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `VideoLearningEvent` (`videoId` INTEGER, `videoTitle` TEXT NOT NULL, `learningEventType` TEXT NOT NULL, `androidId` TEXT NOT NULL, `packageName` TEXT NOT NULL, `time` INTEGER NOT NULL, `id` INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT)";
         Timber.i("sql: " + sql);
-        database.execSQL(sql);
+        try {
+            database.execSQL(sql);
+        } catch (SQLException e) {
+            Timber.e(e, "Error during migration 6 to 7");
+            // Consider implementing a fallback strategy or rethrow the exception
+        }
     }
 };

This addition would provide more detailed logging in case of SQL errors during the migration process.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7906d1 and f48be3c.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • README.md (0 hunks)
  • app/schemas/ai.elimu.analytics.db.RoomDb/7.json (1 hunks)
  • app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/db/RoomDb.java (3 hunks)
  • app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/entity/VideoLearningEvent.java (1 hunks)
  • app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/receiver/VideoLearningEventReceiver.java (1 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
  • README.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/receiver/VideoLearningEventReceiver.java
🔇 Additional comments (8)
app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/entity/VideoLearningEvent.java (2)

8-9: LGTM: Class structure is well-defined.

The VideoLearningEvent class is correctly annotated with @Entity and extends LearningEvent, which is appropriate for a Room database entity representing a specific type of learning event.


19-41: LGTM: Getter and setter methods are well-implemented.

The getter and setter methods for all fields are correctly implemented and follow standard Java naming conventions. They provide proper encapsulation for the class fields.

app/src/main/java/ai/elimu/analytics/db/RoomDb.java (3)

26-26: LGTM: Import statement for VideoLearningEvent.

The import statement for the new VideoLearningEvent entity is correctly added and properly placed with other entity imports.


31-31: LGTM: Updated @database annotation.

The @database annotation has been correctly updated:

  1. The version number has been incremented from 6 to 7, which is necessary for the database migration.
  2. VideoLearningEvent.class has been added to the entities list, allowing Room to recognize the new entity.

These changes are consistent with the addition of a new entity to the database.


62-63: LGTM: Added MIGRATION_6_7 to the migration list.

The MIGRATION_6_7 has been correctly added to the list of migrations in the database builder. This addition is necessary for the database to apply the new migration when upgrading from version 6 to 7, and it's consistent with the database version increment and the new migration strategy.

app/schemas/ai.elimu.analytics.db.RoomDb/7.json (3)

1-6: LGTM: Overall structure and version are correct.

The schema is well-structured with the correct version number (7) and includes an identity hash. This is crucial for Room's migration mechanism and ensures proper database versioning.

Also applies to: 405-411


350-404: LGTM: VideoLearningEvent entity is well-defined.

The VideoLearningEvent entity is correctly structured with appropriate fields:

  • videoId (INTEGER, nullable)
  • videoTitle (TEXT, NOT NULL)
  • learningEventType (TEXT, NOT NULL)
  • androidId (TEXT, NOT NULL)
  • packageName (TEXT, NOT NULL)
  • time (INTEGER, NOT NULL)
  • id (INTEGER, PRIMARY KEY, auto-generated)

This structure is consistent with other learning event entities in the schema.


7-404: LGTM: Entity definitions are consistent and well-structured.

All 7 entities (LetterLearningEvent, LetterAssessmentEvent, LetterSoundLearningEvent, WordLearningEvent, WordAssessmentEvent, StoryBookLearningEvent, and VideoLearningEvent) are defined consistently:

  • Each has a unique table name
  • Fields are properly typed with appropriate constraints
  • All have an auto-generated primary key 'id'
  • Common fields (androidId, packageName, time) are present across all entities

This consistency will facilitate easier querying and maintenance of the database.

@jo-elimu jo-elimu merged commit f9983b6 into main Sep 27, 2024
6 checks passed
@jo-elimu jo-elimu deleted the 155-add-videolearningevent-1 branch September 27, 2024 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add VideoLearningEvent
2 participants