Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Display a warning when an unverified user's identity changes #28211
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Display a warning when an unverified user's identity changes #28211
Changes from 10 commits
6fa98f8
9f2c1a1
0d186dd
0b1e7ad
f4b403d
4e8a990
d2b244f
8078627
5615b98
0ef342b
ccbfcea
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
out of interest, was the switch to doing this in parallel meant to fix something, or just an optimisation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just an optimisation. I changed the function to take a list of users so that it would update
gotVerificationStatusUpdate
for all the users at once, so that if we get an update for, say, Alice, but we haven't started fetching her update status, we won't try to overwrite the update with a fetched value. Then I figured it was silly that we were waiting for one to complete before querying the next.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
okayyy, but now don't we have a problem for a join-leave-join scenario?
I can't help but feel we need a proper queue of things to process :/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I figured out a way to solve it while minimising the changes.