-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adr-0048 subscription-per-customer-model-on-azure #820
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are currently in talks with Azure representatives regarding how we should position ourselves in their marketplace and are going to have a discussion with their technical advisors in the, hopefully, coming days. Therefore I'd postpone sealing this decision in an ADR before we've heard their suggestions while not blocking beta. Is that possible?
I would also like to see multiple tenants as an evaluated option. Maybe it's obvious why it would not be an viable option but let's put it in writing. Take Azure lighthouse into consideration when evaluating multi-tenancy. |
Sure !! I will keep this ADR on hold until we hear from Azure team too !! Yeah for now, it shouldn't be Beta blocker from our end. |
Chosen option: | ||
|
||
- Isolation at the Subscription level i.e Subscription-per-Customer Model. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about environments of the same customer? How will those be isolated? Separate subscription or resource groups?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd say separate subscriptions. So we can treat subscriptions as projects in openstack
and then we have some similarity with them.
1091a74
to
de82ef3
Compare
Quality gates: