Update MARCO solenoid material budget #504
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Briefly, what does this PR introduce?
This PR updates the ePIC Solenoid (MARCO) to the material specifications provided by the design team located at:
https://wiki.bnl.gov/EPIC/index.php?title=Experimental_Solenoid
This material budget is dated October 20, 2022 - I've emailed Renuka and Valerio to get an updated map. This should be considered a draft pull request until the new material is received.
The material map at the location listed above does not include a liquid He layer surrounding the coil, while the existing description included a 1.5mm layer surrounding the coil and in the endcaps. I left this in the new solenoid description, but otherwise the geometry is as described in the spreadsheet. New materials (Brass, NbTi, Solder, and SolenoidCoil) were also added to improve the material description.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Please check if this PR fulfills the following:
Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code?
No breaking changes
Does this PR change default behavior?
No, it just updates the material budget for the MARCO solenoid.
This PR is a response to a material map run for me by Nicholas Schmidt at ORNL - you can see below that the solenoid is almost an interaction length, when it should be closer to 0.5 interaction lengths according to the designers:
The new material map reduces the material budget for the solenoid to be a bit closer to what we would expect:
Once I get an update from Renuka and Valerio I'll update this again, which should be very close to the final configuration.