Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(licenses): adding support for project-only obligations #517
feat(licenses): adding support for project-only obligations #517
Changes from all commits
477019b
28d252e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't there a static var for that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know. Please provide some pointers on where i can find this static var.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems like there is none yet but normally the available parameters are defined in
org.eclipse.sw360.portal.common.PortalConstants
. Maybe just the new ones for Todos there as well?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure if this will not causing problems in existing installations. At least in my test instance, where I had some todos before I switched to this branch, I get the exceptions below. Jackson is configured to break on unknown properties and the persistence might already contain
todoId
fields.EDIT: This comment would have had a better place in libraries/lib-datahandler/src/main/thrift/licenses.thrift L44... Sorry!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was extensively discussed with @mcjaeger as it was his suggestion. Please also see this siemens#19
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, it might be causing trouble though. But let's see how this behaves on other running test instances. I just wanted to warn early.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we have discused it to change it, but I think we would need a migration script before rolling out: https://github.com/eclipse/sw360/tree/master/scripts/migrations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sebastian-su please have a look