Added archived teams page.

[sarahboyce]

Added a basic archive of teams and way to record former team members based off this forum discussion

Screenshots

[bmispelon]

Thanks for working on this!

About the model design, did you consider a custom through model for the Team.members m2m that would have an active boolean field?

I can see that the proposed design with former_members is probably simpler to implement, but it seems to me that it leaves the possibility for some strange limbo cases.
Consider an archived team with active members: unless I misunderstood those members would not be listed on the new archive page.
There's also nothing stopping a member being both in members and in former_members, was that an intended design?

[sarahboyce]

Thanks for working on this!

About the model design, did you consider a custom through model for the Team.members m2m that would have an active boolean field?

I can see that the proposed design with former_members is probably simpler to implement, but it seems to me that it leaves the possibility for some strange limbo cases. Consider an archived team with active members: unless I misunderstood those members would not be listed on the new archive page. There's also nothing stopping a member being both in members and in former_members, was that an intended design?

I can do this
There might be people who want to show their former membership on the Steering Council and be a current member but I can acheive a similar thing and have their details be on the team page if they want a comment by their name

[tim-schilling]

There's also nothing stopping a member being both in members and in former_members, was that an intended design?

That seems reasonable to me. It's easier to manage having a person appear in both membership groups with two M2M fields.

To handle the limbo cases, a team could have some validation that when active is set to False, it confirms there are no members. Or clears the membership.

[sarahboyce]

About the model design, did you consider a custom through model for the Team.members m2m that would have an active boolean field?

I can do this

Before I do the work here, as you cannot add a through model to an existing M2M field, I would need to create a new m2m, migrate the data, remove old field, rename field etc etc
Is it worth it?

[sarahboyce]

Consider an archived team with active members: unless I misunderstood those members would not be listed on the new archive page.

They are listed, see alice in test_archived_team