Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🔀 Merge bitcoin-scriptexec from BitVM #10

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Velnbur
Copy link
Collaborator

@Velnbur Velnbur commented Oct 9, 2024

Objective

Since bitcoin-scriptexec contains certain logic that has to be changed for our needs, we fork it and add to our repository.

git-subtree-dir: bitcoin-scriptexec
git-subtree-split: eeaea1a35e30c06e8c5c46b86ea329c3a5a5c0ab
@Velnbur Velnbur self-assigned this Oct 9, 2024
@ZamDimon ZamDimon changed the title Merge bitcoin-scriptexec from BitVM 🔀 Merge bitcoin-scriptexec from BitVM Oct 9, 2024
@Velnbur Velnbur requested a review from ZamDimon October 9, 2024 17:05
@Velnbur Velnbur added the refactor Reworking certain pieces to make code more readable label Oct 9, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@ZamDimon ZamDimon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI passes, all looks good!

@ZamDimon ZamDimon merged commit 1604330 into main Oct 9, 2024
4 checks passed
@ZamDimon ZamDimon deleted the merge-bitcoin-scriptexec branch October 9, 2024 17:09
ZamDimon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2024
# Objective

Since `bitcoin-scriptexec` contains certain logic that has to be changed
for our needs, we fork it and add to our repository.
ZamDimon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2024
Since `bitcoin-scriptexec` contains certain logic that has to be changed
for our needs, we fork it and add to our repository.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactor Reworking certain pieces to make code more readable
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants