Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Fix_Typos
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
dbraun1991 authored Apr 7, 2020
1 parent 0f5dc38 commit 47802eb
Showing 1 changed file with 7 additions and 7 deletions.
14 changes: 7 additions & 7 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
# How does Artifcial Intelligence impact on the economics of work?

Bachelorthesis from 2017 about how the economics of work is seen to change from progressing AI systems.
Bachelor thesis from 2017 about how the economics of work is seen to change from progressing AI systems.

### Type of Document
Literature Review

### Reasons for Work
1) Bachelorthesis at University of Cologne, Germany, 2017.
2) The topic was lead by my interest in the field.
1) Bachelor thesis at University of Cologne, Germany, 2017.
2) The topic was led by my interest in the field.

### Grading & Relevance
The document was graded as 1.3 in the german scale.
The **german scale** reaches from 1.0, best, to 4.0, worst (just passed).
The document was graded as 1.3 in the German scale. <br/>
The **German scale** reaches from 1.0, best, to 4.0, worst (just passed).

### Reasons for publishing
1) Believe in Open Access / -Source community. Science shall be free.
Expand All @@ -21,6 +21,6 @@ The **german scale** reaches from 1.0, best, to 4.0, worst (just passed).
# Remark
In your position I would not cite from this document.
1) It is **only** a Bachelor-Thesis and represents my knowledge **back in 2017**.
2) The **result of the search** in its bundling of citations represents the value of the work. For you the cited **original texts** as they can be found in the **References** are supposed tobe of the most value.
3) This document has **not** gone through a proper peer review (as the cited texts are). The grade does only reflect the grading of two revisers. NO further recheck has been done. For more reliable sources, search in google scolar or in several scientific journals.
2) The **result of the search** in its bundling of citations represents the value of the work. For you the cited **original texts** as they can be found in the **References** are supposed to be of the most value.
3) This document has **not** gone through a proper peer review (as the cited texts are). The grade does only reflect the grading of two revisers. NO further recheck has been done. For more reliable sources, search in google scholar or in several scientific journals.

0 comments on commit 47802eb

Please sign in to comment.