-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PECO-1541] Optimize UC Volume ingestion #247
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Levko Kravets <[email protected]>
85e8325
to
6ab0178
Compare
Signed-off-by: Levko Kravets <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #247 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 93.18% 93.19% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 63 63
Lines 1525 1529 +4
Branches 266 266
==========================================
+ Hits 1421 1425 +4
Misses 41 41
Partials 63 63 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Do we have a similar issue in the python one? I've been wondering about this for a while. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approve, assuming we already have good test coverage of this feature.
Just checked - in PySQL everything is fine there. |
Currently, when we upload file to volume (SQL
PUT
) file is fully loaded into memory and then sent to a storage. Similarly, when downloading a file (SQLGET
) the file is fully downloaded into memory, and only then stored on disc.To optimize large file handling, Nodejs streams should be used instead.