Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prep for retiring Jackson-flavored ELM #1485

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 22, 2024

Conversation

JPercival
Copy link
Contributor

@JPercival JPercival commented Dec 20, 2024

  • Remove elm-jackson dependencies whereever possible, and swap to elm-jaxb
  • Change tests that expect Jackson-flavored ELM to expect JAXB-flavored ELM
  • Fixed slf4j version mismatch. Upstream project (HAPI) introduced 2.0.13

Copy link

Formatting check succeeded!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.49%. Comparing base (0fb9698) to head (51cd26a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1485      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     64.45%   64.49%   +0.03%     
  Complexity     1939     1939              
============================================
  Files           494      494              
  Lines         28154    28154              
  Branches       5593     5593              
============================================
+ Hits          18146    18157      +11     
+ Misses         7745     7722      -23     
- Partials       2263     2275      +12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@JPercival JPercival merged commit c010793 into master Dec 22, 2024
7 checks passed
@JPercival JPercival deleted the feature-prep-for-jackson-retirement branch December 22, 2024 15:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant