Skip to content

Issues: cplusplus/sender-receiver

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

144 Open 85 Closed
144 Open 85 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Example 1.5.1 "then" doesn't seem to work.
#301 opened Oct 31, 2024 by aaron-michaux
2
when_all/split: operation state might get prematurely destroyed when child completes synchronously inside its stop callback
#300 opened Oct 23, 2024 by jiixyj
8
sync_wait should work with just_stopped() and just_error(e).
#299 opened Oct 22, 2024 by BenFrantzDale
when_all should be described explicitly as not intrinsically parallel
#298 opened Oct 22, 2024 by BenFrantzDale
when_all(just()) shouldn’t have a set_stopped_t() completion signature design needs-paper Needs a paper to be written P0
#297 opened Oct 22, 2024 by BenFrantzDale
get_env() specified in terms of as_const() but this doesn't work with rvalue senders bug Something isn't working P0 wording
#296 opened Oct 22, 2024 by lewissbaker
2
Should when_all and split check the receiver's stop token for stop_requested() and call set_stopped?
#295 opened Oct 18, 2024 by jiixyj
@lewissbaker @ericniebler
run_loop::schedule() should not have set_stopped_t() in its completion signatures if passed an env with an unstoppable_token design P0 wording
#294 opened Oct 16, 2024 by lewissbaker
run_loop::run-loop-sender should remove the item from the list when a stop-request is sent design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0 processed processed in a meeting
#293 opened Oct 15, 2024 by lewissbaker
7
Does basic-receiver need to constrain set_value/set_error/set_stopped on whether complete is invocable? discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet wording
#292 opened Oct 15, 2024 by lewissbaker
env and prop are relying on deprecated behavior bug Something isn't working P1
#291 opened Oct 14, 2024 by ericniebler
execution::split: Conflict between shared_state<Child_Sndr> and shared_state<Out_Sndr>
#290 opened Oct 4, 2024 by mochunshuang
1
should queries be required to have a UUID so that there is a global canonical ordering? design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet needs-paper Needs a paper to be written P0
#289 opened Aug 28, 2024 by ericniebler
2
Should let_value destroy its predecessor operation-state eagerly to allow storage reuse? design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0
#287 opened Aug 14, 2024 by lewissbaker
2
Why do we allow directly querying schedulers, but require receivers to return a separate environment object? design P0
#286 opened Aug 13, 2024 by lewissbaker
Add support for strand-schedulers design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet enhancement New feature or request
#285 opened Aug 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
Clarify the semantics/requirements of the get_scheduler query bug Something isn't working design P0
#284 opened Aug 3, 2024 by lewissbaker
Definition of SCHED-ATTRS incorrectly assumes that schedule operations that complete with set_stopped will complete on that scheduler bug Something isn't working design P0
#283 opened Aug 1, 2024 by lewissbaker
2
grant connect permission to return a type other than decltype(sndr.connect(rcvr)) design P0
#281 opened Jul 19, 2024 by ericniebler
1
the preconditions on run_loop::run() are too strict bug Something isn't working P0 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting wording
#280 opened Jul 18, 2024 by ericniebler
2
noexcept clause of basic-state constructor is incomplete bug Something isn't working P0 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting wording
#279 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
1
Should the default implementation of bulk support cancellation? design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet needs-paper Needs a paper to be written P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting
#278 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
5
bulk doesn't explicitly grant permissions for customisations to execute f concurrently bug Something isn't working design P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting wording
#277 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
1
bulk does not specify what customizations need to do with exceptions thrown from invocations of f bug Something isn't working design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting
#276 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
4
bulk doesn't give the caller a way to constrain how function can be executed bug Something isn't working design P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting
#275 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
4
ProTip! What’s not been updated in a month: updated:<2024-10-06.