-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove & replace .fancy-link and .fancy-link:hover classes #1170
Conversation
@wolfofdalalst is attempting to deploy a commit to the Codú Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple components, primarily focusing on updating the visual styling of links by replacing the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Hello @wolfofdalalst, thanks for opening your first Pull Request. The maintainers will review this Pull Request and provide feedback as soon as possible. Keep up the great work! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
app/(editor)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx (5)
Line range hint
1-838
: Consider breaking down this large component into smaller, focused components.The
Create
component is handling multiple responsibilities including:
- Form management
- File upload
- Tag management
- Preview functionality
- Publication scheduling
This makes the component harder to maintain and test.
Consider extracting these into separate components:
PostForm
- Handle the main form logicImageUploader
- Handle image upload functionalityTagManager
- Handle tag input and managementPreviewPane
- Handle the preview renderingPublishSettings
- Handle publication settingsThis would improve maintainability and make the code more testable.
Line range hint
32-38
: Enhance form validation for better user experience.The form validation could be improved by adding validation schemas using Zod.
Consider adding this validation schema:
const PostFormSchema = z.object({ title: z.string().min(5, "Title must be at least 5 characters"), body: z.string().min(10, "Content must be at least 10 characters"), tags: z.array(z.string()).max(5, "Maximum 5 tags allowed"), excerpt: z.string().max(156, "Excerpt must not exceed 156 characters").optional(), canonicalUrl: z.string().url("Must be a valid URL").optional(), published: z.date().optional() });
Line range hint
89-141
: Simplify tag management logic.The current tag management implementation is verbose and could be simplified.
Consider this more concise implementation:
const handleTagInput = (e: React.KeyboardEvent) => { const tag = tagValue.trim().toUpperCase().replace(/[^\w\s]/gi, ""); if (!["Enter", ",", "."].includes(e.key) || !tag) return; e.preventDefault(); if (tags.includes(tag)) { setError("tags", { message: "Tag already exists" }); } else if (tags.length >= 5) { setError("tags", { message: "Maximum 5 tags allowed" }); } else { clearErrors("tags"); setTags([...tags, tag]); } setTagValue(""); };
Line range hint
142-196
: Extract file upload logic into a custom hook.The file upload logic could be extracted into a reusable hook for better maintainability.
Consider creating a custom hook:
const useImageUpload = () => { const [uploadUrl, setUploadUrl] = useState<string | null>(null); const [uploadStatus, setUploadStatus] = useState<UploadStatus>("default"); const handleUpload = async (file: File) => { setUploadStatus("loading"); try { const signedUrl = await getUploadUrl({ size: file.size, type: file.type, uploadType: "uploads" }); const { fileLocation } = await uploadFile(signedUrl, file); setUploadUrl(fileLocation); setUploadStatus("success"); return fileLocation; } catch (error) { setUploadStatus("error"); throw error; } }; return { uploadUrl, uploadStatus, handleUpload }; };
Line range hint
197-224
: Consider implementing auto-save with optimistic updates.The current save implementation could be enhanced with optimistic updates and better error handling.
Consider implementing a more robust auto-save mechanism:
const useAutoSave = (formData: SavePostInput, postId?: string) => { const [savedTime, setSavedTime] = useState<string>(""); const [isSaving, setIsSaving] = useState(false); const save = useMutation({ mutationFn: async (data: SavePostInput) => { setIsSaving(true); try { const result = postId ? await api.post.update.mutate({ ...data, id: postId }) : await api.post.create.mutate(data); setSavedTime(new Date().toLocaleString()); return result; } finally { setIsSaving(false); } } }); return { save, savedTime, isSaving }; };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- app/(app)/get-started/_client.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/(editor)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx (2 hunks)
- components/ArticlePreview/ArticlePreview.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/Comments/CommentsArea.tsx (1 hunks)
- components/EditorHints/EditorHints.tsx (2 hunks)
- styles/globals.css (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- styles/globals.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/Comments/CommentsArea.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/EditorHints/EditorHints.tsx (1)
32-34
: LGTM! Successfully migrated from global styles to Tailwind.The transition from
.fancy-link
to Tailwind utility classes has been implemented correctly, maintaining the gradient effect while following component-based styling best practices.components/ArticlePreview/ArticlePreview.tsx (1)
161-161
: Verify visual consistency of the new gradient styling.The transition from
.fancy-link
to Tailwind classes looks good. However, let's ensure the new gradient styling maintains visual consistency with other components that have undergone similar changes.Let's verify the consistency of gradient styles across components:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the gradient styling consistency across components.
Let me try one more time with just ripgrep's basic pattern matching without file type specifications.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
The gradient styling is consistent across the codebase
The new gradient styling in ArticlePreview.tsx matches the pattern used consistently throughout the application. The specific gradient combination (
from-orange-400 to-pink-600
with hover stateshover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500
) is used across multiple components for interactive elements and text, maintaining a cohesive visual language. The search results show no remaining.fancy-link
classes, indicating successful migration to Tailwind classes.Key observations:
- The same gradient pattern is used in similar interactive elements across components
- Text-based gradients consistently use
bg-clip-text text-transparent
with the same color scheme- Hover states are consistently implemented
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar gradient styling patterns across components to ensure consistency rg "bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-\d+ to-pink-\d+" --type tsxLength of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar gradient styling patterns across components using different file extensions rg "bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-\d+ to-pink-\d+" -t ts -t jsx -t tsx -t js # Also search for any other gradient patterns to compare styling rg "bg-gradient-to-r.*text-transparent" -t ts -t jsx -t tsx -t js # Check if there are any remaining .fancy-link classes that haven't been migrated rg "fancy-link" -t ts -t jsx -t tsx -t js -t cssLength of output: 278
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for gradient styling patterns rg "bg-gradient-to-r from-orange" --type-list rg "bg-gradient-to-r from-orange" # Search for any remaining fancy-link classes rg "fancy-link" # List all files with .tsx extension to verify file type handling fd ".*\.tsx$"Length of output: 16669
app/(app)/get-started/_client.tsx (1)
42-44
: LGTM! Consider adding underline for better link visibility.The changes successfully replace the global
.fancy-link
class with Tailwind utility classes, maintaining the gradient styling while following component-based approach. The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives.Consider adding
underline
orhover:underline
class to maintain conventional link appearance and improve accessibility:-<Link className="cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent font-medium hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500" href="/"> +<Link className="cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent font-medium hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500 hover:underline" href="/">Let's verify the consistency of link styling across other components mentioned in the AI summary:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to verify the link styling consistency across the codebase.
The first command will help us find similar gradient-styled links, while the second command will help verify if there are any remaining
fancy-link
classes in the codebase. I've expanded the file types to include all possible JavaScript/TypeScript extensions and CSS files.
Let me try one more time with ripgrep without file type specifications:
This should help us verify both the consistency of gradient styling and ensure the removal of fancy-link classes across the codebase.
Let me check the globals.css file to verify if the fancy-link class still exists:
This will help us confirm if the .fancy-link class has been completely removed from the global styles.
Based on the comprehensive results from our verification, I can now provide the final response:
Changes are consistent and .fancy-link has been successfully removed
The verification confirms that:
- The
.fancy-link
class has been completely removed from globals.css- The gradient styling is consistently used across the codebase for similar interactive elements
- The implementation in get-started/_client.tsx aligns with the existing pattern used in other components like EditorHints, CommentsArea, and ArticlePreview
The original review suggestion about adding
hover:underline
was a nitpick that isn't necessary since the codebase consistently uses gradient styling without underlines for these types of links, maintaining a cohesive design system.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other components that might need similar styling updates rg "fancy-link" --type tsxLength of output: 54
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Link components with similar gradient styling rg "bg-gradient.*to-pink" -t ts -t tsx -t jsx -t js # Also search for any remaining fancy-link classes rg "fancy-link" -t ts -t tsx -t jsx -t js -t cssLength of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Link components with similar gradient styling rg "bg-gradient.*to-pink" # Search for any remaining fancy-link classes rg "fancy-link" # List all files with .css extension to check for global styles fd ".css$"Length of output: 11105
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the contents of globals.css cat styles/globals.cssLength of output: 8448
app/(editor)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx (1)
797-799
: LGTM: Link styles successfully migrated from global CSS to Tailwind.The
.fancy-link
class has been correctly replaced with Tailwind's gradient utilities, aligning with the PR's objective to move away from global styles.Also applies to: 806-808
className="cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500" | ||
> | ||
markdownguide |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider extracting duplicate styles into a reusable class.
The gradient styling is duplicated between both links. Consider using Tailwind's @apply
directive or creating a common className variable to maintain consistency and reduce duplication.
Here's how you could refactor this:
const gradientLinkStyle = "cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500";
// Then use it in both links:
className={gradientLinkStyle}
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ const ArticlePreview: NextPage<Props> = ({ | |||
<div className="flex w-full content-center justify-between"> | |||
<div className="flex w-full items-center justify-between"> | |||
<Link | |||
className="fancy-link semibold text-lg" | |||
className="cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500 semibold text-lg" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider extracting the gradient styles into a reusable class.
While the inline Tailwind classes work, consider extracting this commonly used gradient style into a reusable class in your Tailwind config to maintain consistency and make future updates easier.
You could add this to your tailwind.config.js
:
module.exports = {
theme: {
extend: {
// Add a custom class for gradient links
textGradient: {
'link': 'bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500',
},
},
},
}
Then simplify the component usage to:
-className="cursor-pointer bg-gradient-to-r from-orange-400 to-pink-600 bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent hover:from-orange-300 hover:to-pink-500 semibold text-lg"
+className="cursor-pointer text-gradient-link bg-clip-text tracking-wide text-transparent semibold text-lg"
@John-Paul-Larkin changes have been made. |
@John-Paul-Larkin all checks have passed, please review. |
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! 🌮 🦖
✨ Codu Pull Request 💻
Fixes #1160
Pull Request details
In order to transition away from global styles, I have removed and
.fancy-link
and.fancy-link:hover
fromstyles/globals.css
, and replaced it with the equivalent tailwindcss classes, as requested in the above mentioned issue. If there are any changes, do let me know, I will make the necessary changes required. I am working under the hacktoberfest label.Any Breaking changes
None
Associated Screenshots
None