Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create rabbit.yml #211

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

bearycool11
Copy link

CI workflow

CI workflow
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 25, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .workflow/rabbit.yml is excluded by !**/*.yml

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@bearycool11
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai I do appreciate that approval tho

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 25, 2025

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@bearycool11 You're welcome! Happy to help! 😊

Copy link
Author

@bearycool11 bearycool11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's add
name: CI

on:
push:
branches:
- main
pull_request:
branches:
- main

jobs:
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- name: Checkout repository
  uses: actions/checkout@v2

- name: Set up Node.js
  uses: actions/setup-node@v2
  with:
    node-version: '16'

- name: Install dependencies
  run: npm install

- name: Run build
  run: npm run build

- name: Run lint
  run: npm run lint

- name: Run tests
  run: npm test

Copy link
Author

@bearycool11 bearycool11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we're done.

@bearycool11 bearycool11 marked this pull request as draft January 25, 2025 23:05
@bearycool11
Copy link
Author

This workflow is awaiting approval from a maintainer in #211

@coderabbitai who are our maintainers?

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 25, 2025

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@bearycool11 The repository has the following maintainers with admin access:

These maintainers have full administrative permissions and can approve your workflow changes.

🔗 Analysis chain

@bearycool11 Let me fetch the list of maintainers for you. I'll use the GitHub API to get this information.

Note: The response will be based on the repository permissions data returned by the GitHub API.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get repository collaborators with their roles
gh api repos/coderabbitai/coderabbit-docs/collaborators --jq '.[] | {login: .login, role: .role, permissions: .permissions}'

Length of output: 609

@bearycool11
Copy link
Author

cool see you all monday

@bearycool11 bearycool11 marked this pull request as ready for review January 25, 2025 23:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant