Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CSS for navbar item visibility and font size #204

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025
Merged

Conversation

aravindputrevu
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces CSS media queries targeting screen widths of 480 pixels or less. Two new rules are added to hide specific navigation links: one for the root path (href="/") and another for the blog link (href="https://coderabbit.ai/blog"). These changes enhance control over the visibility of navigation items on smaller screens without altering the overall structure or functionality of the navigation bar.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/css/custom.css Added CSS media queries to hide navigation links for root path and blog on small screens.

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's CSS Delight
Navbar links, now you're out of sight,
Logo shines with pixel-perfect might,
Hidden text, a clever design's flight,
CSS magic, pure and bright! 🎨

  • CodeRabbit's Styling Sprite 🌟

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f4cb57 and a3d4349.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/css/custom.css (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/css/custom.css
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Deploying coderabbit-docs with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: a3d4349
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://b3d002fe.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://fix-navbar-ui.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev

View logs

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title @coderabbitai Update CSS for navbar item visibility and font size Jan 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/css/custom.css (1)

313-315: Remove redundant visibility rule.

This rule becomes unnecessary if we implement the suggested accessibility-friendly approach above. If you need to keep it, consider making it more specific.

If you decide to keep this rule, apply this diff to make it more specific:

-.navbar__logo {
+.navbar__items .navbar__brand .navbar__logo {
   visibility: visible;
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bec4ede and 1b3dfb0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/css/custom.css (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/css/custom.css (1)

Line range hint 1-315: Clean up duplicate styles and commented code.

The file contains:

  1. Duplicate CSS blocks (e.g., navbar styles, media queries)
  2. Commented-out code (Discord icon styles)

Consider cleaning up these issues to improve maintainability.

Let's verify the duplicate blocks:

✅ Verification successful

Duplicate CSS blocks and commented code confirmed

The verification confirms multiple duplicate CSS blocks:

  • Duplicate navbar styles (.navbar .navbar__item)
  • Repeated media queries for mobile views
  • Duplicate right navbar alignment (.navbar__items.navbar__items--right)
  • Redundant logo and docs link styles

Suggestions:

  • Consolidate duplicate styles into single declarations
  • Remove commented-out Discord icon styles
  • Group related media queries together
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find duplicate CSS blocks in the file
echo "Analyzing duplicate CSS blocks..."
cat src/css/custom.css | awk '/^[^\/]*{/,/^}/' | sort | uniq -d

Length of output: 1038

src/css/custom.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ankitjena ankitjena merged commit c1cf334 into main Jan 21, 2025
4 checks passed
@ankitjena ankitjena deleted the fix-navbar-ui branch January 21, 2025 07:29
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants