Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] - Towards Billiard 5.0 #292

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[WIP] - Towards Billiard 5.0 #292

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

auvipy
Copy link
Member

@auvipy auvipy commented Nov 15, 2019

work towards billiard 5 to be used with celery 6

@auvipy
Copy link
Member Author

auvipy commented Nov 15, 2019

many things needed to be renamed/reverted to come to a working state.

@auvipy auvipy changed the title [WIP] - Towards Billiard 4.0 [WIP] - Towards Billiard 5.0 Nov 19, 2021
@dejlek
Copy link

dejlek commented Dec 10, 2024

I wonder would it be worth investing time in checking whether moving to multiprocessing is possible, and if so, how feasible would it be? Billiard is multiple source of problems for people like me who need to run process-based stuff in Celery tasks, stuff that normally work with multiprocessing, but fails for various reasons when Billiard is used.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants