show user-specified samples in genomic evolution chart

[svihang8]

Fix cBioPortal/cbioportal#10763
Describe changes proposed in this pull request:

• Enhanced VAFChartControls by adding a feature to select specific samples (Some, All, or None)

Checks

• Has tests or has a separate issue that describes the types of test that should be created. If no test is included it should explicitly be mentioned in the PR why there is no test.
• The commit log is comprehensible. It follows 7 rules of great commit messages. For most PRs a single commit should suffice, in some cases multiple topical commits can be useful. During review it is ok to see tiny commits (e.g. Fix reviewer comments), but right before the code gets merged to master or rc branch, any such commits should be squashed since they are useless to the other developers. Definitely avoid merge commits, use rebase instead.
• Is this PR adding logic based on one or more clinical attributes? If yes, please make sure validation for this attribute is also present in the data validation / data loading layers (in backend repo) and documented in File-Formats Clinical data section!

Any screenshots or GIFs?

This is a visual feature so before/after screenshots have been added to highlight the impact of the feature.
Before Screenshot:-

Screenshot showing how 'All' works:-

Screenshot showing how 'None' works:-

Screenshot showing how selecting specific samples works:-

Screenshot showing compatibility with the groupBy functionality:-

Notify reviewers

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for cbioportalfrontend ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	5a6185b
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/cbioportalfrontend/deploys/6792ebd6c09bc30008fcbc3a
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-5089.preview.cbioportal.org
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[inodb]

Thanks so much @svihang8 ! Looks great!

I think the "All" and "None" state are implied by the checkboxes, so maybe better to not have those separate?

Wondering also if there's another component on the cBioPortal website that could be used for this purpose. The selection box gets kinda big when you select a lot of samples (note that there are some patients with dozens of samples):

Maybe it's cleaner to use a component similar to the one on the mutations tab? See: