fix(secrets): Remove both random and base64 entropy secrets finding

[pazbechor]

User description

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)

New/Edited policies (Delete if not relevant)

Description

Include a description of what makes it a violation and any relevant external links.

Fix

How does someone fix the issue in code and/or in runtime?

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• I have added tests that prove my feature, policy, or fix is effective and works
• New and existing tests pass locally with my changes

---

Generated description

Below is a concise technical summary of the changes proposed in this PR:

Modifies the secret detection logic to remove duplicate entropy-based findings. Enhances the CustomRegexDetector class to better handle multiline regex matches and updates the SecretsRunner to prioritize Random High Entropy findings over Base64 High Entropy findings on the same line.

Topic	Details
Regex Matching	Enhances the CustomRegexDetector class to better handle multiline regex matches Modified files (1) checkov/secrets/plugins/custom_regex_detector.py Latest Contributors(2) User Commit Date omryMen fix-secrets-fix-find-l... November 21, 2024 RabeaZr fix-secrets-multiline-... November 21, 2024
Entropy Detection	Improves the handling of entropy-based secret detection to reduce duplicate findings Modified files (1) checkov/secrets/runner.py Latest Contributors(2) User Commit Date [email protected] feat-secrets-Masking-s... November 17, 2024 [email protected] feat-secrets-Adding-ch... November 17, 2024

This pull request is reviewed by Baz. Join @pazbechor and the rest of your team on (Baz).

[Saarett]

Great work @pazbechor ! Do we have any relevant tests that needs to be changed/added?