-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bombastictranz/awesome #12
Conversation
Stock-control-supervisors/awesome
Stock-control-supervisors/awesome
Stock-control-supervisors/awesome
Stock control supervisors
Stock control supervisors
Create LICENSE
Stock-control-supervisors/awesome
Romeo-Rosete/awesome
PR summaryThe Pull Request appears to be an attempt to add a new list to the Awesome collection, but it lacks crucial information such as the URL to the list and a clear explanation of what the list is about. The PR title does not follow the required format, and the description does not provide an objective description of the project/theme of the list. The PR also includes a series of merges from different branches, updates to a code-of-conduct file, and the creation of a LICENSE file. However, the PR does not adhere to the guidelines provided for creating an Awesome list, such as reviewing other PRs, running Suggestion
Disclaimer: This comment was entirely generated using AI. Be aware that the information provided may be incorrect. Current plan usage: 88.32% Have feedback or need help? |
Stock-control-supervisors/awesome
[Insert URL to the list here]
[Explain what this list is about and why it should be included here]
By submitting this pull request I confirm I've read and complied with the below requirements 🖖
Please read it multiple times. I spent a lot of time on these guidelines and most people miss a lot.
Requirements for your pull request
Try to prioritize unreviewed PRs, but you can also add more comments to reviewed PRs. Go through the below list when reviewing. This requirement is meant to help make the Awesome project self-sustaining. Comment here which PRs you reviewed. You're expected to put a good effort into this and to be thorough. Look at previous PR reviews for inspiration. Just commenting “looks good” or simply marking the pull request as approved does not count! You have to actually point out mistakes or improvement suggestions. Comments pointing out lint violation are allowed, but does not count as a review.
Add Name of List
. It should not contain the wordAwesome
.Add Swift
Add Software Architecture
Update readme.md
Add Awesome Swift
Add swift
add Swift
Adding Swift
Added Swift
- [iOS](…) - Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.
- [Framer](…) - Prototyping interactive UI designs.
- [iOS](…) - Resources and tools for iOS development.
- [Framer](…)
- [Framer](…) - prototyping interactive UI designs
#readme
.- [Software Architecture](https://github.com/simskij/awesome-software-architecture#readme) - The discipline of designing and building software.
Requirements for your Awesome list
That means 30 days from either the first real commit or when it was open-sourced. Whatever is most recent.
awesome-lint
on your list and fix the reported issues. If there are false-positives or things that cannot/shouldn't be fixed, please report it.main
, notmaster
.Mobile operating system for Apple phones and tablets.
Prototyping interactive UI designs.
Resources and tools for iOS development.
Awesome Framer packages and tools.
If you have not put in considerable effort into your list, your pull request will be immediately closed.
awesome-name-of-list
.awesome-swift
awesome-web-typography
awesome-Swift
AwesomeWebTypography
# Awesome Name of List
.# Awesome Swift
# Awesome Web Typography
# awesome-swift
# AwesomeSwift
awesome-list
&awesome
as GitHub topics. I encourage you to add more relevant topics.Awesome X
and a logo withAwesome X
. You can put the header image in a#
(Markdown header) or<h1>
.Contents
, notTable of Contents
.Contributing
orFootnotes
sections.https://github.com/<user>/<repo>/community/license/new?branch=main&template=cc0-1.0
(replace<user>
and<repo>
accordingly).license
orLICENSE
in the repo root with the license text.Licence
section to the readme. GitHub already shows the license name and link to the full text at the top of the repo.unicorn
.contributing.md
. The casing is up to you.Contributing
, positioned at the top or bottom of the main content.Footnotes
section at the bottom of the readme. The section should not be present in the Table of Contents.Example:
- [AVA](…) - JavaScript test runner.
Node.js
, notNodeJS
ornode.js
.You can still use a CI for linting, but the badge has no value in the readme.
Inspired by awesome-foo
orInspired by the Awesome project
kinda link at the top of the readme. The Awesome badge is enough.Go to the top and read it again.